Back

Analysis of the Time-Dependent Behaviors of Atrial Fibrillation with Electrographic Flow Mapping

Haines, D. E.; Kong, M. H.; Ruppersberg, P.; Castellano, S.; Spitzer, S.; Noelker, G.; Rillig, A.; Szili-Torok, T.

2024-01-12 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.01.10.24301125 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundElectrographic flow (EGF) mapping algorithms employing Horn-Schunck flow estimations can create temporospatial visualizations of atrial electrical wavefront propagations during atrial fibrillation (AF). Reproducible patterns of centrifugal EGF activation from discrete sites may represent sites of AF origin or sources. Our objectives were to assess the patterns and prevalence of AF sources using EGF mapping. MethodsUnipolar electrograms were recorded for 1-minute with 64-pole basket catheters. Flow estimates were constructed by passing consecutive frames through an algorithm to learn and then compare typical wave direction patterns to describe flow-field evolution. During each 2-second segment, sites initiating centrifugal activation patterns were defined as AF sources. Maps of source location/activity duration were generated. ResultsThe EGF method was applied to 405 prospective and retrospective patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Mean age 62.5 years; mean LA size 54 mm; mean AF duration 4.6 years. EGF mapping found 6.6 {+/-} 2.4 AF sources/patient (range 1 to 17). Distribution was 55% LA and 45% RA. Dominant sources (prevalence [≥]20%) were demonstrated in 185 (45.7%) patients, but only 10.7% of all sources were dominant. While AF cycle length (CL) was not affected by source prevalence, CL variance significantly decreased as source prevalence increased. ConclusionsComplex AF conduction patterns make ablation challenging, but EGF mapping enables detection and organization of time-dependent AF behaviors. Although many low prevalence sources are detected, they may not be clinically relevant, while higher prevalence sources seem to modulate AF. Recording durations of 1 minute facilitate source discrimination.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.5%
2
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
8
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
9
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
11
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
14
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
16
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%