Back

Ehmt2 Loss-Of-Function Alterations Cause A Kleefstra-Like Syndrome

Martinez-Delgado, B.; Lopez-Martin, E.; Kerkhof, J.; Baladron, B.; Mielu, L. M.; Sanchez-Ponce, D.; Bada-Navarro, A.; Herrero-Matesanz, M.; Lopez-Jimenez, L.; Rzasa, J.; Rots, D.; Fernandez, M.; Hernandez-San Miguel, E.; Gomez-Mariano, G.; Marin-Reina, P.; Cazorla-Calleja, R.; Alonso, J.; Kleefstra, T.; Posada, M.; Bermejo-Sanchez, E.; Sadikovic, B.; Barrero, M. J.

2024-01-11 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.01.10.24300997 medRxiv
Show abstract

Dysregulation of the epigenetic machinery is associated with neurodevelopmental defects in humans. Kleefstra syndrome (KS) is a neurodevelopmental syndrome caused by heterozygous alterations in the gene EHMT1 that cause loss-of-function. EHTM1 and EHMT2 are highly similar histone methyltransferases that play relevant roles in development. Despite their similarity, individuals with alterations in EHMT2 have never been described. Here, we describe a pediatric patient with a KS-overlapping phenotype and a single base de novo substitution in EHMT2 that causes the amino acid change p.Ala1077Ser in the catalytic SET domain. This change causes a reduction in the affinity of the catalytic domain for the H3 tail and in the activity of the enzyme by three- to five-fold. DNA methylation, histone methylation and gene expression profiles suggest a significant overlap between the EHMT2 p.Ala1077Ser variant and KS. Based on this evidence we suggest that EHMT2 haploinsufficiency causes a Kleefstra-like syndrome. Although we cannot rule out dominant negative effects caused by the EHMT2 p.Ala1077Ser variant, our data and previously published data suggest that loss of EHMT2 function is probably more detrimental to cells than loss of EHMT1, explaining why individuals with alterations in EHMT2 are very rare.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.