Back

Gating of Memory to Behavior by the Locus Coeruleus

Wang, T.; Duan, H.; Zhang, X.; Xia, D.; Li, T.; Yan, R.; Zhan, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, W.-J.; Zhou, Q.

2024-01-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.01.09.574947 bioRxiv
Show abstract

An essential function of memory is to guide behavior for survival and adaptation. While considerable knowledge has been accumulated on memory formation, much less is understood about how retrieved memories direct behavior/action. In the auditory Pavolovian threat conditioning paradigm, retrieval of conditioned threat memory activates dorsomedial prefrontal (dmPFC) neurons exhibiting transient responses (T-neurons), which activate both dmPFC neurons exhibiting sustained responses (S-neurons) and locus coeruleus (LC) neurons. Auditory inputs to S-neurons enable the conversion from transient to sustained responses so that the freezing durations match those of the auditory cues. Activation of LC neurons is required for the conversion by enhancing S-neuron responses, which, interestingly, opens a short time window during which non-conditioned cues also lead to freezing. The transition from memory to behavior thus hinges on the integration of retrieved memory, sensory inputs, and emotional/body state cues to generate a selective, adequate, and finely tuned behavior. Significance statementThis study provides new insights into the neural circuitry and mechanisms of how retrieved memories direct the execution of behavior in response to conditioned threatening stimuli. It reveals how different neuron types in the dmPFC interact with LC neurons to determine and modulate the duration and intensity of defensive responses. It also shows that activation of LC neurons can induce the generalization of freezing to non-threatening cues, which may have implications for understanding anxiety disorders. This study contributes to the field of neuroscience by advancing the understanding of memory-behavior conversion and role of the dmPFC and LC in conditioned threat/fear behavior.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.