Back

Blocker-SELEX: A Structure-guided Strategy for Developing Inhibitory Aptamers Disrupting Undruggable Transcription Factor Interactions

Wei, Y.; Tan, W.; Wu, Q.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, G.; Zhu, X.; Tao, Y.; Fan, M.; Sha, C.; Lin, A.; Qin, J.; Chen, W.; Fu, T.

2024-01-10 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.01.09.574928 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the well-established significance of transcription factors (TFs) in pathogenesis, their utilization as pharmacological targets has been limited by the inherent challenges associated with modulating their protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. The lack of defined small-molecule binding pockets and the nuclear localization of TFs do not favor the use of small-molecule inhibitors, or neutral antibodies, in blocking TF interactions. Aptamers are short oligonucleotides exhibiting high affinity and specificity for a diverse range of targets. Large molecular weights, expansive blocking surfaces and efficient cellular internalization make aptamers a compelling molecular tool for use as traditional TF interaction modulators. Here, we report a structure-guided design strategy called Blocker-SELEX to develop inhibitory aptamers (iAptamer) that selectively block TF interactions. Our approach led to the discovery of iAptamers that cooperatively disrupts SCAF4/SCAF8-RNA Polymerase II (RNAP2) interactions, thereby dysregulating RNAP2-dependent gene expression and splicing and, in turn, leading to the impairment of cell proliferation. This approach was further applied to develop iAptamers to efficiently block WDR5-MYC interaction with a nexus in cancer. Taken together, our study highlights the potential of Blocker-SELEX in developing iAptamers that effectively disrupt potentially pathogenic TF interactions with attendant implications for iAptamers as chemical tools for use in the study of biological functions of TF interactions, but also for potential use in nucleic acids drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.