Back

A Genetic Screen for regulators of CNS morphology in Drosophila

Lacin, H.; Zhu, Y.; DiPaola, J.; Wilson, B. A.; Zhu, Y.; Skeath, J. B.

2024-01-10 genetics
10.1101/2024.01.09.574922 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite increasing in mass approximately 100-fold during larval life, the Drosophila CNS maintains its characteristic form during this rapid growth phase. Dynamic interactions between the overlying basement membrane and underlying surface glia are known to regulate CNS structure in Drosophila, but the genes and pathways that establish and maintain CNS morphology during development remain poorly characterized. To identify genes that regulate CNS shape in Drosophila, we conducted an EMS-based, forward genetic screen of the second chromosome, uncovered 50 mutations that disrupt CNS structure, and mapped these alleles to 17 genes. Whole genome sequencing revealed the affected gene for all but one mutation. Identified genes include well characterized regulators of tissue shape, like LanB1, viking, and Collagen type IV alpha1, as well as previously characterized genes, such as Toll-2 and Rme-8, with no known role in regulating CNS structure. We also uncovered that papilin and C1GalTA likely act in the same pathway to regulate CNS structure and found that the fly homolog of a glucuronosyltransferase, B4GAT1/LARGE1, that regulates Dystroglycan function in mammals is required to maintain CNS shape in Drosophila. Finally, we show that the senseless-2 transcription factor is expressed and functions specifically in surface glia found on peripheral nerves but not those on the CNS proper to govern CNS structure, identifying a gene that functionally subdivides a glial subtype along the peripheral-central axis. Future work on these genes should clarify the genetic mechanisms that ensure the homeostasis of CNS shape and form during development.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.