Back

Associations between common genetic variants and income provide insights about the socioeconomic health gradient

Kweon, H.; Burik, C. A. P.; Ning, Y.; Ahlskog, R.; Xia, C.; Abner, E.; Bao, Y.; Bhatta, L.; Faquih, T.; Feijter, M.; Fisher, P.; Gelemanovic, A.; Giannelis, A.; Hottenga, J.-J.; Khalili, B.; Lee, Y.; Li-Gao, R.; Masso, J.; Myhre, R.; Palviainen, T.; Rietveld, C. A. P.; Teumer, A.; Verweij, R. M.; Willoughby, E. A.; Agerbo, E.; Bergmann, S.; Boomsma, D. I.; Borglum, A. D.; Brumpton, B. M.; Davies, N. M.; Esko, T.; Gordon, S. D.; Homuth, G.; Ikram, A.; Johannesson, M.; Kaprio, J.; Kidd, M. P.; Kutalik, Z.; Kwong, A. S. F.; Lee, J.; Luik, A.; Mook-Kanamori, D. O.; Magnus, P.; Marques-Vidal, P.; M

2024-01-10 genetics
10.1101/2024.01.09.574865 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on income among individuals of European descent and leveraged the results to investigate the socio-economic health gradient (N=668,288). We found 162 genomic loci associated with a common genetic factor underlying various income measures, all with small effect sizes. Our GWAS-derived polygenic index captures 1 - 4% of income variance, with only one-fourth attributed to direct genetic effects. A phenome-wide association study using this polygenic index showed reduced risks for a broad spectrum of diseases, including hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, coronary atherosclerosis, depression, asthma, and back pain. The income factor showed a substantial genetic correlation (0.92, s.e. = .006) with educational attainment (EA). Accounting for EAs genetic overlap with income revealed that the remaining genetic signal for higher income related to better mental health but reduced physical health benefits and increased participation in risky behaviours such as drinking and smoking.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.