Back

Diagnostic utility of in vivo expressed mycobacterial RNA transcripts in pleural fluid for the differential diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis.

Kaur, P.; Sharma, S.; Abhishek, S.; Aggarwal, A. N.; Kaur, K.; Yadav, R.; Sethi, S.; Bal, A.; Verma, I.

2024-01-11 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2024.01.09.24300747
Show abstract

BackgroundTuberculous pleuritis (TBP), the extra-pulmonary manifestation of tuberculosis, is the second most common after TB lymphadenitis. Histopathology using biopsy samples is the most sensitive diagnostic procedure for TBP, however the biopsy acquisition is invasive. Therefore, better screening markers for diagnosis using pleural fluid are required. The pathogen biomarkers expressed at the site of infection may play a potential role in designing a newer diagnostic assay. Thus, the current study was planned to look for mycobacterial RNA biomarkers in TBP and to assess their diagnostic utility in pleural fluid. MethodsTBP suspects (n=261) were recruited in the current study. Out of these 45 suspects were excluded and the remaining (n=216) were divided into TBP (n=54) and non-TBP (n=162) groups based on composite reference standard. A whole genome microarray was carried using M.tb RNA from pleural biopsies of TB patients. The data was validated using qRT-PCR and the diagnostic utility of top two highly expressed genes was assessed in pleural fluid of using a real time RT-PCR assay. ResultsOverall, 1856 genes were differentially expressed in microarray of which 1365 were upregulated and 491 were downregulated. After validation of microarray gene expression, two genes namely Rv1586 and Rv2543 were selected for assessment of their diagnostic utility in TBP. The combined analysis for the presence of either of genes in the pleural fluid led to identification of pleural TB patients with 79.6% sensitivity and 93.28% specificity. ConclusionThe transcripts of genes Rv1586 and Rv2543 holds potential for the development of a RNA based molecular diagnostic assay in pleural fluid of TBP patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 0.3%
13.7%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 43%
11.6%
3
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 1.0%
7.8%
4
Respiratory Research
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
based on 32 papers
Top 0.7%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 41%
4.6%
8
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 0.9%
4.6%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
11
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
13
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
1.6%
15
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
16
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%