Back

The earliest allopolyploidization in tracheophytes revealed by phylotranscriptomics and morphology of Selaginellaceae

Kang, J.-S.; Yu, J.-g.; Xiang, Q.-P.; Zhang, X.-C.

2024-01-09 genomics
10.1101/2024.01.08.574748 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Selaginellaceae exhibit extraordinary evolutionary history in which they survived and thrived during the Permian-Triassic extinction and did not undergo polyploidization. Here, we reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of Selaginellaceae by applying large-scale nuclear genes from RNA-seq, and found that each group showed phylogenetic incongruences among single-gene trees with different frequencies. In particular, three different phylogenetic positions of the sanguinolenta group were recovered by different nuclear gene sets. We evaluated the factors that might lead to the phylogenetic incongruence of the sanguinolenta group and concluded that hybridization between each ancestor of two superclades is the most likely cause. We presented the supporting evidence from gene flow test, species network inference, and plastome-based phylogeny. Furthermore, morphological characters and chromosomal evidence also lend support to the hybrid origin of this group. The divergence time estimations, using two gene sets respectively, indicated the splits between the sanguinolenta group and each related superclade happened around the same period, implying that the hybridization event probably occurred during the Early Triassic. This study reveals an ancient allopolyploidization with integrative evidence and robust analyses, which sheds new light on the recalcitrant phylogenetic problem of the sanguinolenta group and reports the polyploidization in the basal vascular plants, Selaginellaceae.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.6%
2
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
23
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.5%
26
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%