Visual image familiarity learning at multiple timescales in the primate inferotemporal cortex
Mohan, K.; Obilinovic, U. P.; Srednyak, S.; Amit, Y.; Brunel, N.; Freedman, D. J.
Show abstract
Humans and other primates can rapidly detect familiar objects and distinguish them from never-before-seen novel objects. We have an astonishing capacity to remember the details of visual scenes even after a single, fleeting experience. This ability is thought to rely in part on experience-dependent changes in the primate inferotemporal cortex (IT). Single neurons in IT encode visual familiarity by discriminating between novel and familiar stimuli, with stronger neural activity on average for novel images. However, key open questions are to understand how neural encoding in IT changes as images progress from novel to highly familiar, and what learning rules and computations can account for learning-dependent changes in IT activity. Here, we investigate the timescales over which novel stimuli become familiar by recording in IT as initially novel images become increasingly familiar both within and across days. We identified salient and persistent memory-related signals in IT that spanned multiple timescales of minutes, hours, and days. Average neural activity progressively decreased with familiarity as firing rates were strongest for novel, weaker for intermediately familiar, and weakest for highly familiar images. Neural signatures of familiarity learning were slow to develop as response reductions to initially-novel images emerged gradually over multiple days (or hundreds of views) of visual experience. In addition to slow changes that emerged across sessions, neural responses to novel images showed rapid decreases with familiarity within single sessions. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying changes of visual responses with familiarity, we use computational modeling to investigate which plasticity rules are consistent with these changes. Learning rules inferred from the neural data revealed a strong diversity with many neurons following a negative plasticity rule as they exhibited synaptic depression over the course of learning across multiple days. A recurrent network model with two plasticity time constants - a slow time constant for long timescales and a fast time constant for short timescales - captured key dynamic features accompanying the transition from novel to familiar, including a gradual decrease in firing rates over multiple sessions, and a rapid decrease in firing rates within single sessions. Our findings suggest that distinct and complementary plasticity rules operating at different timescales may underlie the inferotemporal code for visual familiarity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential excitability of PV and SST neurons results in distinct functional roles in inhibition stabilization of Up-states 97%
- Trial-to-trial variability of spiking delay activity in prefrontal cortex constrains burst-coding models of working memory 97%
- Excitatory-inhibitory windows shape coherent neuronal dynamics driven by optogenetic stimulation in the primate brain 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A general decoding strategy explains the relationship between behavior and correlated variability 97%
- Discriminating neural ensemble patterns through dendritic computations in randomly connected feedforward networks 97%
- Interacting rhythms enhance sensitivity of target detection in a fronto-parietal computational model of visual attention 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The neural and computational architecture of feedback dynamics in mouse cortex during stimulus report 96%
- Traces of semantization - from episodic to semantic memory in a spiking cortical network model 95%
- Theta oscillations gate the transmission of reliable sequences in the medial entorhinal cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.