Global spatial potential for implementing land-based climate mitigation
Beaury, E. M.; Smith, J.; Levine, J.
Show abstract
Land-based mitigation strategies (LBMS) are critical to reducing climate change and will require large areas for their implementation. Yet few studies have considered how and where LBMS compete for land or are mutually compatible across Earths surface. We derived high resolution estimates of the spatial distribution of 19 different LBMS. We estimated 8.9 billion ha suitable for LBMS across the Earth, including 5.6 Bha suitable for only one of the studied strategies and 3.3 Bha suitable for multiple LBMS. We identified significant conflicts between better carbon management of existing land cover types, and restoration-based strategies such as reforestation. At the same time, several agricultural management LBMS were compatible over large areas, including for example, enhanced weathering and improved plantation rotations. Our analysis presents local stakeholders, communities, and governments with the range of LBMS options, and the opportunity costs associated with scaling up any given LBMS to reduce global climate change.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and amenity 91%
- Intersecting vulnerabilities: Climatic and demographic contributions to future population exposure to Aedes-borne viruses in the United States 86%
- Positive effects of projected climate change on post-disturbance forest regrowth rates in northeastern North American boreal forests 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Landscape heterogeneity and soil biota are central to multi-taxa diversity for landscape restoration 91%
- Continental-scale relationships of fine root and soil carbon stocks hold in grasslands but not forests 91%
- Stochastic Assembly and Metabolic Network Reorganization Drive Microbial Resilience in Arid Soils 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.