Assessing Causal Relationships Between Diabetes Mellitus and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Moss, S. T.; Minelli, C.; Leavy, O. C.; Allen, R. J.; Oliver, N.; Wain, L. V.; Jenkins, R. G.; Stewart, I.
Show abstract
RationaleIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a disease of progressive lung scarring. There is a known association between IPF and diabetes mellitus (DM), but it is unclear whether this association is due to causal relationships between these traits. ObjectivesTo examine causal relationships between DM, diabetes-associated traits, and IPF using a Mendelian randomisation approach. MethodsFollowing a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach, we used genetic variants identified from genome wide association studies (GWAS) for type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D), glycated haemoglobin level (HbA1c), fasting insulin level, and body mass index (BMI) to assess for evidence of causal effects of these traits on IPF risk. Further analyses using pleiotropy-robust and multivariable MR methods were performed to account for the inherent complexity of the traits being investigated. ResultsResults did not suggest that either T1D (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93-1.07, p = 0.902) or T2D (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.93-1.11, p = 0.692) are in the causal pathway of IPF. No significant effects were suggested of HbA1c (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.63-2.22, p = 0.592) or fasting insulin level (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.31-1.15, p = 0.124) on IPF risk, but effects of BMI on IPF risk were indicated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.12-1.85, p = 0.004). ConclusionThis study suggests that DM and IPF are unlikely to be causally linked. This comorbid relationship may instead be driven by shared risk factors or treatment effects. Key messagesWhat is already known on this topic: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with diabetes mellitus epidemiologically, but it is unclear if these traits are linked by causal effects. What this study adds: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and diabetes mellitus are unlikely to be causally linked, suggesting that shared environmental risk factors or treatment effects may drive this comorbid relationship. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Further research investigating the relationship between diabetes mellitus and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis should focus on potential shared risk factors such as smoking, and treatment effects including corticosteroid use.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic and proteomic signatures of type 2 diabetes subtypes in an Arab population 94%
- Disentangling the direct and indirect effects of childhood adiposity on type 1 diabetes and immune-associated diseases: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study 94%
- A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic review of precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes 93%
- Genetics identifies obesity as a shared risk factor for co-occurring multiple long-term conditions. 92%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The putative causal effect of type 2 diabetes in risk of cataract: a Mendelian randomization study in East Asian 95%
- Clustered Mendelian Randomization analyses identifies distinct and opposing pathways in the causal association between insulin-like growth factor-1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus 94%
- Genetic Risk Scores for Cardiometabolic Traits in Sub-Saharan African Populations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network Analysis Reveals Protein Modules Associated with Childhood Respiratory Diseases 90%
- Reduced SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine immunogenicity and protection in mice with diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. 89%
- Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Variation in Asthma Risk, Severity, and Exacerbations 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.