Mindfulness Coaching with Digital Lifestyle Monitoring Enhances Selective Attention in Medical Scientists
Jaiswal, S.; Nan, J.; Purpura, S. R.; Manchanda, J.; Garcia-pak, I.; Ramanathan, D.; Chuss, D.; Rana, D. T.; Beck, E.; Insel, P.; Chi, N.; Roth, D.; Patel, H.; Mishra, J.
Show abstract
Medical scientists have dual commitments to clinical care and research efforts. Such commitments can create hectic and stressful work schedules, which may impact on well-being and cognition. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that mindfulness coaching plus wearable-based lifestyle monitoring can benefit such individuals. We conducted a waitlist-controlled intervention study (n=43) with M.D./Ph.D. preclinical or graduate students and post M.D./Ph.D. trainees/faculty. Assessments of quantitative outcomes included subjective measures of burnout, mindfulness, self-compassion, and well-being, as well as objective cognitive assessments. The results showed no impacts on subjective measures. However, amongst objective cognitive measures, selective attention performance was significantly improved following the intervention (bias corrected effect size, Hedges g = 1.13, p=0.005). Extent of improvement in selective attention correlated with suppression of visual alpha oscillations - a neural marker for distractibility - measured using electroencephalography (EEG) (r=-0.32, p<0.05). Qualitative feedback showed that after receiving the intervention, participants in both groups equally rated the overall experience as "very good" (3.70 {+/-}0.98 out 5). They also appreciated that the intervention emphasized healthy lifestyle behaviors, and contributed to mindfulness, compassion, and a sense of community. A majority (57%) of the participants reported that they expect to change their well-being related behaviors because of the intervention. Overall, this study suggests the utility of mindfulness coaching to improve selective attention skills in medical scientists and that more needs to be done to enhance subjective well-being in such individuals.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Methodological Checklist for fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity Studies: Development and Expert Consensus 89%
- Long-term in vivo imaging of Drosophila larvae 88%
- Z-REX: Shepherding Reactive Electrophiles to Specific Proteins Expressed either Tissue-Specifically or Ubiquitously, and Recording the Resultant Functional Electrophile-Induced Redox Responses in Larval Fish 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remembering what is relevant: how is goal-directed memory reactivation supported by attentional selection? 95%
- Sound perception in realistic surgery scenarios: Towards EEG-based auditory work strain measures for medical personnel. 95%
- Electrophysiological resting-state signatures link polygenic scores to general intelligence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probing sustained attention and fatigue across the lifespan 94%
- Augmenting complex and dynamic performance through mindfulness-based cognitive training: an evaluation of training adherence, trait mindfulness, personality and resting-state EEG. 94%
- Action-value processing underlies the role of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in performance monitoring during self-regulation of affect 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards Biophysical Markers of Depression Vulnerability 92%
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Targeting the Default Mode Network for the Treatment of Depression 91%
- Evaluation of easy-to-implement anti-stress interventions in a series of N-of-1 trials: Study protocol of the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians Study (ASIP) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-stimulus alpha power modulates trial-by-trial variability in theta rhythmic multisensory entrainment strength and theta-induced memory effect 93%
- Working memory processing boosts the neural representation of long-term memories 93%
- The Temporal Dynamics of Metacognitive Experiences Track Rational Adaptations in Task Performance 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.