Back

Development of robust antiviral assays using relevant apical-out human airway organoids

Lee, J.-H.; LeCher, J. C.; Parigoris, E.; Shinagawa, N.; Sentosa, J.; Manfredi, C.; Goh, S. L.; De, R.; Tao, S.; Zandi, K.; Amblard, F.; Sorscher, E. J.; Spence, J. R.; Tirouvanziam, R.; Schinazi, R. F.; Takayama, S.

2024-07-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.01.02.573939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While breakthroughs with organoids have emerged as next-generation in vitro tools, standardization for drug discovery remains a challenge. This work introduces human airway organoids with reversed biopolarity (AORBs), cultured and analyzed in a high-throughput, single-organoid-per-well format, enabling milestones towards standardization. AORBs exhibit a spatio-temporally stable apical-out morphology, facilitating high-yield direct intact-organoid virus infection. Single-cell RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry confirm the physiologically relevant recapitulation of differentiated human airway epithelia. The cellular tropism of five severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains along with host response differences between Delta, Washington, and Omicron variants, as observed in transcriptomic profiles, also suggest clinical relevance. Dose-response analysis of three well-studied SARS-CoV-2 antiviral compounds (remdesivir, bemnifosbuvir, and nirmatrelvir) demonstrates that AORBs efficiently predict human efficacy, comparable to gold-standard air-liquid interface cultures, but with higher throughput ([~]10-fold) and fewer cells ([~]100-fold). This combination of throughput and relevance allows AORBs to robustly detect false negative results in efficacy, preventing irretrievable loss of promising lead compounds. While this work leverages the SARS-CoV-2 study as a proof-of-concept application, the standardization capacity of AORB holds broader implications in line with regulatory efforts to push alternatives to animal studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.