Back

Optical Genome Mapping improves detection and streamlines analysis of structural variants in myeloid neoplasms.

Raca, G.; Sahoo, T.; Iqbal, A.; Smolarek, T.; Levy, B.; Dupont, B.; Ryall, S.; Dubuc, A.; Sahajpal, N.; Liu, J.; Liao, J.; Wang, Z.-X.; Stence, A. A.; Guseva, N.; Broach, J. R.; Miller, C.; Ma, D.; Blachly, J.; Michaels, P. D.; Kolhe, R.; Kanagal-Shamanna, R.

2024-01-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.01.02.24300691 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of hematological malignancies require disease-specific laboratory testing procedures involving the use of hematopathology, flow cytometry, molecular, and cytogenetic testing. While individual laboratories develop unique workflows to accommodate volume, clinical needs, and staffing, cytogenetic laboratories generally require a multitude of targeted and genome-wide tests that detect clinically relevant aberrations in hematologic malignancies. Specifically, the frequent use of multiple FISH panels coupled with concurrent chromosome analysis, can be both labor, and resource intensive. Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) is a comprehensive cytogenetic solution for detecting structural variants with high resolution and increased accuracy for hematological malignancy subtypes at the DNA level without need of any cell culture regimens. A new software tool for analysis of OGM data called VIA (Variant Intelligence Applications), provides an integrative analysis, interpretation, and reporting solution for OGM and other datatypes. In this study, we performed retrospective review of 56 datasets, representing 10 unique myeloid cases to assess multi-user (technologist and laboratory director) analyses and classification. Interpretation and reporting of OGM results were 100% concordant between reviewers for four cases with negative results by standard of care (SOC) testing. For the other six cases, five pathognomonic gene fusions identified by SOC assays were unanimously reported as Tier 1A classification was unanimous for five sentinel gene fusion rearrangements identified by SOC. OGM also found additional structural variants of clinical relevance in five of the six cases that were not found by SOC methods. Leveraging automatic pre-classification of variants and a custom decision tree, the VIA software enabled complete analysis with a mean technologist review time (variant analysis and initial tier determination) of 30.7 minutes. The analysis, interpretation, and reporting workflow described in this pilot study provides a framework for standardized and streamlined reporting of clinically significant variant in myeloid malignancies using VIA.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
12
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
17
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%