Back

A high-fidelity in vitro model of the human intestinal epithelium

Fujii, S.; Espenschied, S. T.; Anand, V.; Bettencourt-Silva, J.; Han, Y.; Ito, G.; Koseki, A.; Kosugi, A.; Kozlowski, J.; Matsumoto, R.; Meng, S.; Mulligan, N.; Musich, R. J.; Newhall, K.; Ohshina, E.; Sekiguchi, S.; Wang, Y.; Hu, J.; Ciorba, M. A.; Sibley, L. D.; Okamoto, R.; Stappenbeck, T. S.

2025-06-14 cell biology
10.1101/2024.01.01.573838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Primary intestinal epithelial stem cell culture methods have significantly advanced understanding of mammalian intestinal development and disease. However, progress has been hampered by inconsistent methodological reporting and challenges comparing in vitro systems with in vivo observations. We previously established a unique method for long-term 2{-}dimensional (2D) cultivation of mouse lECs using an air-liquid interface (ALI) technique which appears to faithfully recapitulate homeostatic and regenerative features in vitro. Here, we further refined these methods and optimized protocols for long-term, self-organizing 2D cultivation of human lECs. During the culture, we observed that epithelial cells undergo a dynamic morphological transition from squamous to columnar shape. Using single cell transcriptomics, we identified both major lineages and minor populations, including enteroendocrine cells, tuft cells, and BEST4/CA7+ cells. Leveraging the power and scalability of a biomedical foundation model (BMFM) trained on single cell RNA sequencing data, we performed classification tasks to identify cell types across sample sources and to quantitatively benchmark our in vitro differentiated cells against cells collected from patient biopsies. We observed a striking degree of similarity between our in vitro differentiated cells and the corresponding cell types in vivo for multiple differentiated lineages. This novel approach using BMFM holds promise to expand our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms including gene-gene regulation underlying homeostasis and regeneration as well as the functions of rare and poorly understood lineages within the human intestinal epithelia. Moreover, these methods are generalizable to other organs and can be used to assess the correspondence of cells across experimental modalities. SignificanceThis manuscript addresses challenges in quantitative comparisons of cell types grown in vitro vs their in vivo counterparts. Here we use the intestinal epithelium as a model system to address this challenge. We devised an in vitro culture platform that supports multipotent intestinal epithelial stem cells and their numerous differentiated progeny. This system gives rise to all known rare and abundant lineages in correct proportions. Novel use of biomedical foundation models pre-trained on publicly available data and then fine-tuned to data from this platform enabled demonstration of high concordance of multiple in vitro differentiated lineages with the corresponding cells in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.1%
3
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.5%
4
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
6
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.6%
7
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.4%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.1%
12
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
21
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.7%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
25
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%