Back

Advancing Aquaculture Monitoring through Self-Powered Remote Systems: Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Approach

Mehdipour, I.

2024-01-02 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.12.31.573301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This paper introduces the conceptualization and implementation of a sea wave piezoelectric energy harvesting system designed for a self-powered IoT buoy sensor, tailored for the remote monitoring of water quality variables in fish farming. The developed autonomous system undertakes periodic measurements of temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen, with the gathered data transmitted locally through a low-power wide-area network protocol to a gateway. The gateway is intricately connected to a cloud service, facilitating efficient data storage and visualization. At the heart of this innovation lies a novel buoy design capable of harnessing energy from sea surface waves. The proposed piezoelectric energy harvesting system comprises two pivotal components: an energy transfer mechanism responsible for capturing incident sea surface wave energy and a piezoelectric fin serving as the transducer. Extensive data analysis of sea wave patterns spanning nearly 25 years informs the design process. Subsequently, a prototype is meticulously crafted, fabricated, and rigorously tested in a controlled environment, showcasing promising results. The outcome is a self-powered remote monitoring tool poised to revolutionize fish farming scenarios by enabling seamless, automatic data acquisition, and storage.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
○ 221 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
● 40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Bioengineering
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Ecological Informatics
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
21
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
Sustainability
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
● 35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
HardwareX
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.