Back

Genome-wide characterisation of pathogenicity-related proteins in Mycena citricolor, the causal agent of the American Leaf Spot in coffee

Larke-Mejia, N. L.; Arciniegas, N.; Di Palma, F.; Angel C, C. A.; De Vega, J. J.

2023-12-30 genomics
10.1101/2023.12.30.573698 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mycena citricolor is a fungus that causes the American Leaf Spot (ALS) disease in multiple hosts, including coffee and avocado. This hemibiotroph penetrates the plant through damage induced by oxalic acid. This can cause 20-90% crop losses in coffee depending on the environmental and production conditions. M. citricolor is the only known pathogenic species in the Mycena genus, a large group of saprophytic mushrooms. Comparing the saprophytic and pathogenic genomes can allow us to identify genetic machinery associated with the pathogens genome-wide functional acquisitions to cause disease. To identify pathogenicity-related genes in M. citricolor, we analysed protein family copy-number variation, secretome prediction, and homology to known virulence factors in two M. citricolor assemblies, including a newly assembled and annotated long-read genome. We found that the pathogenic M. citricolor had a higher proportion of secreted genes expanded in copy-number, and expanded gene copies homologous to known virulence factors than the saprophytic Mycena. We shortlisted over 300 candidate genes in each M. citricolor assembly. Focusing on genes strongly regulated during plant interaction, we found over 100 candidates, primarily from multiple copies (up to 4-3 times) of 42 well-known virulence factors (e.g. MFS1, CUTA, NoxA/B, OLE1, NorA), plus a few clade-specific uncharacterised genes. M. citricolor transition to a pathogenic lifestyle reflected genome-wide functional changes. M. citricolor seems to primarily depend on well-known virulence factors in large copy numbers, suggesting the molecular plant-interaction processes involved are like those of better-studied fungi. Hypothetically, the development of ALS resistance could mirror studied responses to these virulence factors.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
2
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
5
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
13
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
24
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
29
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%