Back

First cleavage is a manifestation of the geometry of the unfertilized oocyte: implications for monozygotic twinning in mice.

Nolte, T.; Halabian, R.; Israel, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Fuellen, G.; Makalowski, W.; Boiani, M.

2023-12-30 developmental biology
10.1101/2023.12.30.572752 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A long-standing question in mammalian embryology is whether regional differences of oocyte composition matter for the properties of blastomeres receiving those regions after fertilization. A hitherto untested hypothesis is that allocation depends on the orientation of 1st cleavage. However, the orientation is influenced by the site of sperm entry, which can be almost anywhere on the membrane of oocytes when these are inseminated. This variability undermines consistency and reproducibility of studies. Therefore, we harnessed the intracytoplasmic sperm injection to impose the site of fertilization in three specific ooplasmic regions (animal pole, vegetal pole, equator) in mice. Notwithstanding this categorical distinction, after 1st cleavage, the sister blastomeres differed from each other nearly the same way, as measured by gene expression and twin blastocysts formation following 2-cell embryo splitting. We reasoned that either the oocyte territories did not matter, or their effect was obscured by other factors. To shed light on these possibilities, we immobilized the oocytes on the micromanipulation stage during sperm injection and for 24 h thereafter. Imaging revealed that the orientation of 1st cleavage, instead of varying with the fertilization site, followed the shorter diameter of the unfertilized oocyte. This led in most cases to the segregation of animal and vegetal hemispheres into the sister blastomeres of 2-cell embryos. Since one blastomere received more of the animal materials and the other blastomere more of the vegetal materials, this offers a rationale to explain the distinct properties of monozygotic twins derived from 2-cell embryos in mice.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.