Pharmacological modulation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors reveals distinct neural networks related to probabilistic learning in non-human primates.
Fujimoto, A.; Elorette, C.; Fujimoto, S. H.; Fleysher, L.; Rudebeck, P. H.; Russ, B. E.
Show abstract
The neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) has a multifaceted role in healthy and disordered brains through its action on multiple subtypes of dopaminergic receptors. How modulation of these receptors influences learning and motivation by altering intrinsic brain-wide networks remains unclear. Here we performed parallel behavioral and resting-state functional MRI experiments after administration of two different DA receptor antagonists in macaque monkeys. Systemic administration of SCH-23390 (D1 antagonist) slowed probabilistic learning when subjects had to learn new stimulus-reward associations and diminished functional connectivity (FC) in cortico-cortical and fronto-striatal connections. By contrast, haloperidol (D2 antagonist) improved learning and broadly enhanced FC in cortical connections. Further comparisons between the effect of SCH-23390/haloperidol on behavioral and resting-state FC revealed specific cortical and subcortical networks associated with the cognitive and motivational effects of DA manipulation, respectively. Thus, we reveal distinct brain-wide networks that are associated with the dopaminergic control of learning and motivation via DA receptors. Significance StatementD1 and D2 receptors are heavily implicated in cognitive and motivational processes, as well as in a number of psychiatric disorders. Despite this, little is known about how selective manipulation of these different receptors impacts cognition through changing activity across brain-wide intrinsic networks. Here, we examined the acute behavioral and brain-wide effects of D1 and D2 receptor-selective antagonists, SCH-23390 and haloperidol, in macaques performing a probabilistic learning task. SCH administration diminished, and haloperidol improved, animals task performance. Mirroring these effects on behavior, SCH reduced, and haloperidol increased, the resting-state functional connectivity across brain-wide networks, most notably in the cortico-striatal areas. Thus, our results highlight the opposing effects of D1 and D2 receptor modulation on the brain and behavior.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Resting-state fMRI-based screening of deschloroclozapine in rhesus macaques predicts dosage-dependent behavioral effects 95%
- Dopamine D1-receptor Organization Contributes to Functional Brain Architecture 94%
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The M1/M4 agonist xanomeline modulates functional connectivity and NMDAR antagonist-induced changes in the mouse brain 95%
- Amphetamine disrupts haemodynamic correlates of prediction errors in nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex 94%
- Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not cognitive control: converging fMRI evidence from Go-Nogo and Flanker tasks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neuroreceptors and transporters underlying spontaneous brain activity 95%
- Amphetamine in Adolescence Induces a Sex-Specific Mesolimbic Dopamine Phenotype in the Adult Prefrontal Cortex 94%
- Distinct neural computations scale the violation of expected reward and emotion in social transgressions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competitive interactions between motor and episodic memory systems during interleaved learning 94%
- Effect of relative social rank within a social hierarchy on neural activation in response to familiar or unfamiliar social signals 93%
- Functional Parcellation of the Default Mode Network: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.