Back

Emerging dynamic regimes and tipping points from finite empirical principles

Cobo-Lopez, S.; Witt, M.; Rohwer, F. L.; Luque, A.

2023-12-27 ecology
10.1101/2023.12.27.573307 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The dynamics of biogeochemical, ecological, and astronomical systems are transient. Yet, predicting the occurrence of dynamical shifts remains a challenge due to inferential uncertainties from datasets and the limitations of asymptotic-dependent theories. To address this problem, we developed a theoretical framework that builds on the finite nature of observations. This framework assesses the relative importance of processes, defined as the mechanisms that contribute to the rate of change of the systems dynamic variables, and it predicts the critical values that would trigger a shift into a new regime. The number of observable dynamic regimes within the framework increases exponentially with the number of processes. Observers, however, only experience dynamic regimes associated with relevant processes-- those exceeding a tipping point--within their reference framework. A case study of the framework was tested for a classic predator-prey system with four processes parameterized for bacteria (prey) and lytic bacteriophages (predator). The analysis recovered the sixteen dynamic regimes predicted by the framework, including two non-trivial quasi-equilibrium dynamics. An adaptive Boolean model, which used only relevant observable processes, validated the accuracy of the framework, recovering the dynamics of the full model. The observational framework introduced here provides a strategy for identifying the processes and conditions that lead to tipping points, representing a conceptual paradigm shift in transient dynamics, placing the focus on the specific, finite context of the observer, rather than the intrinsic, asymptotic states of the system. SIGNIFICANCESudden shifts in ecological, climate, and biological systems--so-called tipping points or critical transitions--are notoriously difficult to predict. This study introduces a mathematical framework that redefines these transitions as outcomes shaped by the observers empirical limits. By accounting for finite observation time and resolution, the framework uncovers a rich spectrum of dynamic regimes that classical theories overlook. Its conceptual rigor and practical value are demonstrated in a predator-prey system. This new approach reframes how to forecast regime shifts in complex systems and offers a tool with broad relevance, from microbial ecosystems to planetary climate.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
11
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
12
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
14
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.9%
19
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
New Journal of Physics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%