Beyond the medical file: a scoping review on patients perspectives on guideline-oriented depression treatment in primary care
Biersack, K.; Sattel, H.; Schönweger, P.; Kaspar, L.; Lehnen, N.; Gensichen, J.; Henningsen, P.
Show abstract
ObjectivesDepressive disorders are common in the primary care setting. Primary care practitioners must deal with different disorders and keep up with evidence-based treatment. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) offer accessible information about up-to-date care but are poorly implemented. Research on the implementation of CPGs has focused on the practitioners perspective but has neglected the patients perspective largely. This scoping review aimed to identify terms related to the concept of patients perspectives on depression treatment in primary care building a comprehensive framework and to identify researched barriers and facilitators to partaking in care. MethodsWe conducted a scoping review on Medline and Psycinfo. Eligible publications contained information from the patients point of view on depression treatment in primary care in OECD member states. We used the PCC-framework to obtain inclusion criteria. Publications until August 2nd 2023 were considered. ResultsWe included 232 publications. Current literature focuses on behavioral and easily collected measures like satisfaction and on patient-sided barriers and facilitators to adherence. Other treatment-related behaviors are less researched. Patients often report exclusively or mainly physical symptoms in their visits which can impede diagnosis. ConclusionThis review provides a comprehensive framework for the concept. Research on the patients perspective on depression treatment in primary care is still inconclusive. RegistrationThis review is registered via OSF (https://osf.io/p9rnc).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 98%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Global prevalence of antidepressant utilization in the community: A protocol for a systematic review 94%
- A systematic review protocol for estimation of the prevalence of depression using diagnostic instruments in the elderly population in India, 2000-2019 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reclaiming health: a qualitative, explorative study of long covid recovery journeys involving mind-body approaches. 90%
- Early Evidence and Predictors of Mental Distress of Adults One Month in the COVID-19 Epidemic in Brazil 89%
- The individual and combined associations of depression and socioeconomic status with risk of major cardiovascular events: a prospective cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Enhance Sleep in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer s Disease: A Systematic Review 87%
- Improving sleep after stroke: a randomised controlled trial of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia 87%
- Sleeping under the waves: a longitudinal study across the contagion peaks of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Quantification of the association between predisposing health conditions, demographic, and behavioural factors with hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.