A comprehensive alignment-filtering methodology improves phylogeny particularly by filtering overly divergent segments
Zhang, Q.; Qin, X.; Lu, Y.; Li, P.; Huang, X.
Show abstract
O_LIAlignment problems may be complicated and diverse and the performance of the existing alignment-filtering tools, particularly their potential effect on phylogenetic reconstruction, have remained debated or limitedly explored. C_LIO_LIIn the present study, we developed a new R package named alignmentFilter to treat the diverse alignment problems, especially masking ambiguously-aligned or overly divergent segments using a newly devised grouping-regrouping algorithms acting on sequence divergence in each of sliding windows throughout alignment. Then we tested and compared the power and accuracy of the prevalent alignment-filtering tools, particularly the effect on phylogeny based on Angiospermae genome-scale data and simulated data. C_LIO_LIThe results indicate the alignment-filtering methods alone may affect the phylogeny decisively, producing (strongly-supported) phylogenetic conflicts. In most cases, alignmentFilter most efficiently improves phylogeny, yielding more congruent phylogeny regardless of phylogeny-reconstruction methods, producing phylogeny more concordant to the priori tree regarding to both topology and branch length in simulation, and most efficiently decreasing the root-to-tip length heterogeneity that is implied to be negatively correlated with topological accuracy. C_LIO_LIThe concepts and algorithms of alignmentFilter are quite distinct from existing alignment-filtering methods. It is not susceptible to specific types of alignment errors that usually baffle other methods and can reach the optimal solution frequently with lowest computation complexity. The biological or statistical sense of the key optional stringency-controlling parameter is more straightforward and the setting and outcome may be more adjustable or predictable. A better and more comprehensive solution of alignment problems in this study will benefit tremendous downstream analyses sourced from alignment and phylogeny. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing gene tree conflict in plastome-inferred phylogenies 95%
- Genomic comparison of non-photosynthetic plants from the family Balanophoraceae with their photosynthetic relatives. 94%
- Relict groups of spiny frogs indicate Late Paleogene-Early Neogene trans-Tibet dispersal of thermophile faunal elements 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l. 95%
- A 4-lineage statistical suite to evaluate the support of large-scale retrotransposon insertion data to reconstruct evolutionary trees 94%
- Phylogenetic conflicts, combinability, and deep phylogenomics in plants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nightmare or delight: taxonomic circumscription meets reticulate evolution in the phylogenomic era 95%
- Target sequence capture data shed light on the deeper evolutionary relationship on the subgenus Chamaecerasus of Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae) 95%
- Molecular species delimitation in the primitively segmented spider genus Heptathela endemic to Japanese islands 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- EvANI benchmarking workflow for evolutionary distance estimation 89%
- Kernel Local Fisher Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (KLFDAPC) significantly improves the accuracy of predicting geographic origin of individuals 89%
- PTFSpot: Deep co-learning on transcription factors and their binding regions attains impeccable universality in plants 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The unresolved phylogenomic tree of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera): assessing the potential causes and consequences 92%
- Phylogenomic Analysis of Protein-Coding Genes Resolves Complex Gall Wasp Relationships 92%
- A transcriptome-based phylogeny of Scarabaeoidea confirms the sister group relationship of dung beetles and phytophagous pleurostict scarabs (Coleoptera) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.