Back

A comprehensive alignment-filtering methodology improves phylogeny particularly by filtering overly divergent segments

Zhang, Q.; Qin, X.; Lu, Y.; Li, P.; Huang, X.

2023-12-26 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.12.26.573321 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIAlignment problems may be complicated and diverse and the performance of the existing alignment-filtering tools, particularly their potential effect on phylogenetic reconstruction, have remained debated or limitedly explored. C_LIO_LIIn the present study, we developed a new R package named alignmentFilter to treat the diverse alignment problems, especially masking ambiguously-aligned or overly divergent segments using a newly devised grouping-regrouping algorithms acting on sequence divergence in each of sliding windows throughout alignment. Then we tested and compared the power and accuracy of the prevalent alignment-filtering tools, particularly the effect on phylogeny based on Angiospermae genome-scale data and simulated data. C_LIO_LIThe results indicate the alignment-filtering methods alone may affect the phylogeny decisively, producing (strongly-supported) phylogenetic conflicts. In most cases, alignmentFilter most efficiently improves phylogeny, yielding more congruent phylogeny regardless of phylogeny-reconstruction methods, producing phylogeny more concordant to the priori tree regarding to both topology and branch length in simulation, and most efficiently decreasing the root-to-tip length heterogeneity that is implied to be negatively correlated with topological accuracy. C_LIO_LIThe concepts and algorithms of alignmentFilter are quite distinct from existing alignment-filtering methods. It is not susceptible to specific types of alignment errors that usually baffle other methods and can reach the optimal solution frequently with lowest computation complexity. The biological or statistical sense of the key optional stringency-controlling parameter is more straightforward and the setting and outcome may be more adjustable or predictable. A better and more comprehensive solution of alignment problems in this study will benefit tremendous downstream analyses sourced from alignment and phylogeny. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.