Back

Automated In Vitro Wound Healing Assay

Cwycyshyn, J.; Stansbury, C.; Meixner, W.; Hoying, J. B.; Muir, L. A.; Rajapakse, I.

2023-12-23 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.12.23.573213 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Restoring the epidermal barrier after injury requires spatial and temporal orchestration of migration, proliferation, and signaling across many cell types. The mechanisms that coordinate this complex process are incompletely understood. In vitro wound assays are common model systems for examining these mechanisms in wound healing. In the scratch assay, a cell-free gap is created by mechanical removal of cells from a monolayer, followed by monitoring cell migration into the gap over time. While simple and low-cost, manual scratch assays are limited by low reproducibility and low throughput. Here, we have designed a robotics-assisted automated wound healing (AWH) assay that increases reproducibility and throughput while integrating automated live-cell imaging and analysis. Wounds are designed as computer-aided design (CAD) models and recreated in confluent cell layers by the BioAssemblyBot (BAB) 3D-bioprinting platform. The dynamics of migration and proliferation in individual cells are evaluated over the course of wound closure using live-cell fluorescence microscopy and our high-performance image processing pipeline. The AWH assay outperforms the standard scratch assay with enhanced consistency in wound geometry. Our ability to create diverse wound shapes in any multi-well plate with the BAB not only allows for multiple experimental conditions to be analyzed in parallel but also offers versatility in the design of wound healing experiments. Our method emerges as a valuable tool for the automated completion and analysis of high-throughput, reproducible, and adaptable in vitro wound healing assays.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.3%
2
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
5
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
7
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
14
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
STAR Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
28
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%