Distinct ancient structural polymorphisms control heterodichogamy in walnuts and hickories
Groh, J. S.; Vik, D. C.; Stevens, K. A.; Brown, P. J.; Langley, C. H.; Coop, G.
Show abstract
The maintenance of stable mating type polymorphisms is a classic example of balancing selection, underlying the nearly ubiquitous 50/50 sex ratio in species with separate sexes. One lesser known but intriguing example of a balanced mating polymorphism in angiosperms is heterodichogamy - polymorphism for opposing directions of dichogamy (temporal separation of male and female function in hermaphrodites) within a flowering season. This mating system is common throughout Juglandaceae, the family that includes globally important and iconic nut and timber crops - walnuts (Juglans), as well as pecan and other hickories (Carya). In both genera, heterodichogamy is controlled by a single dominant allele. We fine-map the locus in each genus, and find two ancient (>50 Mya) structural variants involving different genes that both segregate as genus-wide trans-species polymorphisms. The Juglans locus maps to a ca. 20 kb structural variant adjacent to a probable trehalose phosphate phosphatase (TPPD-1), homologs of which regulate floral development in model systems. TPPD-1 is differentially expressed between morphs in developing male flowers, with increased allele-specific expression of the dominant haplotype copy. Across species, the dominant haplotype contains a tandem array of duplicated sequence motifs, part of which is an inverted copy of the TPPD-1 3 UTR. These repeats generate various distinct small RNAs matching sequences within the 3 UTR and further downstream. In contrast to the single-gene Juglans locus, the Carya heterodichogamy locus maps to a ca. 200-450 kb cluster of tightly linked polymorphisms across 20 genes, some of which have known roles in flowering and are differentially expressed between morphs in developing flowers. The dominant haplotype in pecan, which is nearly always heterozygous and appears to rarely recombine, shows markedly reduced genetic diversity and is over twice as long as its recessive counterpart due to accumulation of various types of transposable elements. We did not detect either genetic system in other heterodichogamous genera within Juglandaceae, suggesting that additional genetic systems for heterodichogamy may yet remain undiscovered.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fate of a supergene in the shift from diploidy to polyploidy 96%
- Pan-angiosperm analysis of the CLE signaling peptide family unveils paths, patterns, and predictions of paralog diversification 95%
- Fine-scale Population Structure of North American Arabidopsis thaliana Reveals Multiple Sources of Introduction from Across Eurasia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic analyses of the Linum distyly supergene reveal convergent evolution at the molecular level 96%
- A novel family of secreted proteins linked to plant gall development 96%
- The diallelic self-incompatibility system in Oleaceae is controlled by a hemizygous genomic region expressing a gibberellin pathway gene 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps 94%
- Genomic basis of parallel adaptation varies with divergence in Arabidopsis and its relatives 94%
- The Avocado Genome Informs Deep Angiosperm Phylogeny, Highlights Introgressive Hybridization, and Reveals Pathogen Influenced Gene Space Adaptation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Not so local: the population genetics of convergent adaptation in maize and teosinte. 94%
- Gamete-specific expression of TALE class HD genes activates the diploid sporophyte program in Marchantia polymorpha 94%
- Repeated origins, gene flow, and allelic interactions of herbicide resistance mutations in a widespread agricultural weed 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.