Back

Multiple performance peaks for scale-biting in an adaptive radiation of pupfishes

Tan, A.; St John, M. E.; Chau, D.; Clair, C.; Chan, H.; Holzman, R.; Martin, C.

2023-12-23 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.12.22.573139 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The physical interactions between organisms and their environment ultimately shape their rate of speciation and adaptive radiation, but the contributions of biomechanics to evolutionary divergence are frequently overlooked. Here we investigated an adaptive radiation of Cyprinodon pupfishes to measure the relationship between feeding kinematics and performance during adaptation to a novel trophic niche, lepidophagy, in which a predator removes only the scales, mucus, and sometimes tissue from their prey using scraping and biting attacks. We used high-speed video to film scale-biting strikes on gelatin cubes by scale-eater, molluscivore, generalist, and hybrid pupfishes and subsequently measured the dimensions of each bite. We then trained the SLEAP machine-learning animal tracking model to measure kinematic landmarks and automatically scored over 100,000 frames from 227 recorded strikes. Scale-eaters exhibited increased peak gape and greater bite length; however, substantial within-individual kinematic variation resulted in poor discrimination of strikes by species or strike type. Nonetheless, a complex performance landscape with two distinct peaks best predicted gel-biting performance, corresponding to a significant nonlinear interaction between peak gape and peak jaw protrusion in which scale-eaters and their hybrids occupied a second performance peak requiring larger peak gape and greater jaw protrusion. A bite performance valley separating scale-eaters from other species may have contributed to their rapid evolution and is consistent with multiple estimates of a multi-peak fitness landscape in the wild. We thus present an efficient deep-learning automated pipeline for kinematic analyses of feeding strikes and a new biomechanical model for understanding the performance and rapid evolution of a rare trophic niche.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.8%
2
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
4
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%