Back

Combining transcutaneous spinal stimulation and functional electrical stimulation increases force generated by lower limbs: When more is more

Steele, A. G.; Vette, A. H.; Martin, C.; Masani, K.; Sayenko, D. G.

2023-12-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.12.22.573119 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscutaneous Spinal Stimulation (TSS) has been shown to promote activation of the lower limb and trunk muscles and is being actively explored for improving the motor outcomes of people with neurological conditions. However, individual responses to TSS vary, and often the muscle responses are insufficient to produce enough force for self-supported standing. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can activate individual muscles and assist in closing this functional gap, but it introduces questions regarding timing between modalities. MethodsTo assess the effects of TSS and FES on force generation, ten neurologically intact participants underwent (1) TSS only, (2) FES only, and (3) TSS + FES. TSS was delivered using four electrodes placed at T10-T11 through the L1-L2 intervertebral spaces simultaneously, while FES was delivered to the skin over the right knee extensors and plantarflexors. For all conditions, TSS and FES were delivered using three 0.5 ms biphasic square-wave pulses at 15 Hz. During the TSS + FES condition, timing between the two modalities was adjusted in increments of [1/4] time between pulses (16.5 ms). ResultsWhen TSS preceded FES, a larger force production was observed. We also determined several changes in muscle activation amplitude at different relative stimulus intervals, which help characterize our finding and indicate the facilitating and inhibitory effects of the modalities. ConclusionsUtilizing a delay ranging from 15 to 30 ms between stimuli resulted in higher mean force generation in both the knee and ankle joints, regardless of the selected FES location (Average; knee: 112.0%, ankle: 103.1%).

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.