Back

Single-molecule FRET and molecular dynamics simulations reveal early activation steps of MET receptor by Listeria monocytogenes

Li, Y.; Arghittu, S. M.; Dietz, M. S.; Hasse, D.; Ferraris, D. M.; Freund, P.; Barth, H.-D.; Niemann, H. H.; Covino, R.; Heilemann, M.

2023-12-23 biophysics
10.1101/2023.12.22.572978 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The assembly of membrane receptors into signaling complexes is at the origin of key cellular events. Yet, we often lack detailed structural mechanistic understanding. Receptors are embedded into a complex cellular membrane, which defines their dynamics but also complicates their experimental characterizations significantly. Here, we showcase an integrative structural biology approach to investigate the activation mechanism of the human growth factor receptor MET. MET is a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in cell proliferation, migration, and survival. MET is also hijacked by the intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Its invasion protein, internalin B (InlB), binds to MET and promotes the formation of a signaling dimer that triggers the internalization of the pathogen. Crystallography had suggested two different 2:2 MET:InlB complexes. Here, we use a combination of structural biology, modeling, molecular dynamics simulations, and in situ single-molecule Forster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to elucidate the early events in MET activation. Simulations show that InlB binding stabilizes MET in a conformation that promotes dimer formation. smFRET identifies the organization of the in situ signaling dimer, which resembles one of the two crystal structures yet shows differences. Further MD simulations resulted in a refinement of the dimer model, which is in quantitative agreement with smFRET results. We accurately describe the structural dynamics underpinning an important cellular event and introduce a powerful methodological pipeline applicable to studying the activation of other plasma membrane receptors in situ.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.