Back

The RNA-binding protein RbpB is a central regulator of polysaccharide utilization in gut Bacteroides

Ruttiger, A.-S.; Ryan, D.; Spiga, L.; Lamm-Schmidt, V.; Prezza, G.; Reichardt, S.; Barquist, L.; Faber, F.; Zhu, W.; Westermann, A. J.

2023-12-22 microbiology
10.1101/2023.12.22.572801 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Paramount to human health, symbiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract rely on the breakdown of complex polysaccharides to thrive in this sugar-deprived environment. Gut Bacteroides are metabolic generalists and deploy dozens of polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) to forage diverse dietary and host-derived glycans. The expression of the multi-protein PUL complexes is tightly regulated at the transcriptional level. However, how PULs are orchestrated at translational level in response to the fluctuating levels of their cognate substrates is unknown. Here, we identify the RNA-binding protein RbpB and a family of noncoding RNAs as key players in post-transcriptional PUL regulation. Ablation of RbpB in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron displays compromised colonization in the mouse gut in a host diet-dependent manner. Current dogma holds that individual PULs are regulated by dedicated transcriptional regulators. We demonstrate that RbpB acts as a global RNA binder that directly interacts with several hundred cellular transcripts. This includes a paralogous noncoding RNA family comprised of 14 members, the FopS (family of paralogous sRNAs) cluster. Through a series of in-vitro and in-vivo assays, we reveal that FopS sRNAs repress the translation of a SusC-like glycan transporter when substrates are limited--an effect antagonized by RbpB. Together, this study implicates RNA-coordinated metabolic control as an important, yet previously overlooked, factor contributing to the in-vivo fitness of predominant microbiota species in dynamic nutrient landscapes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.