Back

A community-based participatory research approach to the development, refinement, and distribution of Test-to-PrEP: A peer-to-peer distributed at-home HIV self-test and prevention information kit in Miami-Dade, Florida

Butts, S.; Rodriguez, E.; Craker, L.; Johnson, A. L.; Whiteside, P.; Blackmon, J.; Kenya, S.; Kanamori, M.; Doblecki-Lewis, S.

2023-12-26 hiv aids
10.1101/2023.12.22.23300158 medRxiv
Show abstract

In the US, there is a need for interventions that address gaps in awareness, interest, and uptake of HIV testing and biomedical HIV prevention strategies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis and non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis. The Test-to-PrEP intervention; an HIV self-test bundled with prevention information that was distributed via a social network strategy, was found to be effective at bridging said gaps. This manuscript presents the development and design of Test-to-PrEP, in which a community-based participatory research approach was used. The intervention combines peer-to-peer distribution of HIV self-testing kits with tailored HIV prevention education. Key features include culturally sensitive educational materials, a strategic emphasis on the connection between intervention distributors and recipients, and rigorous training protocols. Our process led to the creation of materials that were neutral to sexual identity, highlighting the importance of inclusivity and cultural relevance. It also led to a mechanism that allows enhanced network member selection. Stakeholder guidance ensured the initiative was well-aligned with community needs, enhancing its potential acceptability and effectiveness. By centering community needs and cultural nuances, interventions like Test-to-PrEP can potentially increase their reach and efficacy. Our development process underscores the importance of community engagement, cultural relevance, and well-defined reporting.

Published in BMC Health Services Research (predicted rank #15) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.