Back

Cryptosporidium Life Cycle Small Molecule Probing Implicates Translational Repression And An Apetala 2 Transcription Factor In Sexual Differentiation

Hasan, M. M.; Mattice, E. B.; Teixeira, J. E.; Jumani, R. S.; Stebbins, E. E.; Klopfer, C. E.; Franco, S. E.; Love, M. S.; McNamara, C. W.; Huston, C. D.

2023-12-18 microbiology
10.1101/2023.12.18.572108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium is a leading cause of childhood diarrhea in developing countries. Current treatment options are inadequate and multiple preclinical compounds are being actively pursued as potential drugs for cryptosporidiosis. Unlike most apicomplexans, Cryptosporidium spp. sequentially replicate asexually and then sexually within a single host to complete their lifecycles. Anti-cryptosporidial compounds are generally identified or tested through in vitro phenotypic assays that only assess the asexual stages. Therefore, compounds that specifically target the sexual stages remain unexplored. In this study, we leveraged the ReFRAME drug repurposing library against a newly devised multi-readout imaging assay to identify small-molecule compounds that modulate sexual differentiation and maturation. mRNA-seq studies confirmed selective modulation of sexual differentiation for 10 hit compounds (9 inhibitors and 1 accelerator). The collective transcriptomic profiles of these compounds indicates that translational repression accompanies Cryptosporidium sexual differentiation, which we validated experimentally. Additionally, cross comparison of the RNA-seq data with promoter sequence analysis for stage-specific genes converged on a key role for an Apetala 2 (AP2) transcription factor (cgd2_3490) in sexual differentiation. Finally, drug annotation for the ReFRAME hits indicates that an elevated supply of energy equivalence in the host cell is critical for gamont formation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.