The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Normative Data from a Large, Population-Based Sample of Healthy Adults in China
Wei, Q.; Du, B.; Liu, Y.; Cao, S.; Yin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, T.; Wu, X.; Tian, Y.; Hu, P.; Wang, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a valuable tool for detecting cognitive impairment, but its accuracy is significantly influenced by demographic and socio-cultural factors. Consequently, the development of appropriate normative values becomes particularly crucial in ensuring its reliable use and interpretation. ObjectiveGenerate MoCA normative values based on demographics for healthy chinese adults. MethodsThe assessment conducted in this study utilizes the MoCA scale, specifically employing the Mandarin-8.1 version (Chinese Mandarin version). Based on the geographical distribution of administrative regions in mainland china, this study recruited a total of 3,097 healthy individuals aged over 20 years. Drawing on insights from prior normative studies, we performed multiple linear regression analysis, incorporating age, gender, and education level as predictor variables, to examine their associations with the total score and sub-cognitive domains of MoCA. Subsequently, we established normative values and cut-off values stratified by age and education level. ResultsThe participants in this study (n=3,097) exhibit a balanced gender distribution, with an average age of 54.46 years (SD 14.38) and an average education period of 9.49 years (SD 4.61). The study population demonstrates an average MoCA score of 23.25 points (SD 4.82). The findings from the multiple linear regression analysis indicate that the total score of MoCA is influenced by age and education level, collectively accounting for 46.8% of the total variance. Higher age and lower education level are correlated with lower MoCA total scores. ConclusionThis study offers normative MoCA values specific to the Chinese population. Furthermore, the research findings indicate that a score of 26 may not represent the most optimal cut-off value. When assessing MoCA scores, it is imperative to comprehensively account for the participants age and educational background.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between finger movement characteristics and voxel-based specific regional analysis systems for Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive function in Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline 96%
- Proteomic associations with cognitive variability as measured by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in a healthy Thai population: A machine learning approach 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity, and post-stroke cognition: a moderated mediation analysis 93%
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 92%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiometabolic Indicators of Cognitive Impairment in The Cameron County Hispanic Cohort 93%
- High frequency post-pause word choices and task-dependent speech behavior characterize connected speech in individuals with mild cognitive impairment 92%
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG with an interactive assessment tool 94%
- Regular Tai Chi Practice Is Associated with Improved Memory as well as Structural and Functional Integrity of the Hippocampal Formation in the Elderly 92%
- Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.