Motor mirror neurons may not be a predictor of learning but reflect the effect of motor learning
Blagoveshchenski, E.
Show abstract
The mirror neurons system (MNS) fires during both the performance of an action and observation of the same action being performed by another. On the level of motor output, activation of the MNS is thought to be represented in the phenomenon of motor resonance, which manifests in a muscle-specific increase in corticospinal excitability during action observation. This study focused on how and to what extent sensorimotor learning alters the initial mirror response and whether the rate of sensorimotor learning is associated with pretraining or post-training levels of mirror response. The study involved 23 healthy adults aged 22.7 years. The experiment consisted of six sessions. On the first and last days, a transcranial magnetic stimulation session was held to assess the putative activity of mirror neurons, as reflected in the level of motor-evoked potential facilitation during action observation in different conditions. From the second to the fifth sessions (four sessions in total), the sensorimotor learning part was performed, as represented in the form of a serial reaction time (SRT) task. We observed a statistically significant decrease of reaction time in the process of learning in the SRT task and motor facilitation during action observation, thus reflecting the process of putative mirror neurons activity. However, our data demonstrate that the sensorimotor learning rate was not associated with either pretraining or post-training estimates of motor facilitation during action observation and that sensorimotor learning does not affect the pattern of motor resonance.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits. 95%
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill 95%
- Effects of bilateral and unilateral mental practice on actual motor performance and event-related desynchronization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An acute session of motor imagery training induces use-dependent plasticity. 97%
- Tactile versus Motor Imagery: Differences in Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS 96%
- Enhanced mirroring upon mutual gaze: Multimodal evidence from TMS-assessed corticospinal excitability and the EEG mu rhythm 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The stretch-shortening cycle effect is not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations 94%
- The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation 94%
- Acute intermittent hypoxia-induced increases maximal motor unit discharge rates in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.