Self-perception of mental health, COVID-19 and associated sociodemographic-contextual factors in Latin American
Roa, P.; Rosas, G.; Nino, G. I.; Moreno, S. M.; Mejia, J.; Aguirre, H.; Alarcon, J.; Reis, R.; Hino, A.; Lopez, F.; Salvo, D.; Ramirez, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to estimate the prevalence of alterations in the self-perception of mental health (SpMH) during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors in four Latin American countries. Methods: A cross-sectional study of data collected from adults in 2021 through the McDonnell Collaborative COVID-19 Response Survey. The sample was composed by 8125 people from Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Chile. A generalized linear model (GLM) for a binary outcome variable with a logistic link and fixed country effects was used. Results: There were 2336 (28.75%) people who considered having suffered alterations in SpMH. The unemployed [OR: 1.40 (95% CI: 1.24-1.58)], those with bad/regular quality of life [OR: 5.03 (95% CI: 4.01-6.31)], and those with high socioeconomic status (SES) [OR: 1.66 (95% CI: 1.41-1.96)] had a higher risk of SpMH alterations than those with full-time employment, excellent quality, and low SES status. According to the fixed-effects model, Brazilians living in the country during the pandemic, who disagreed with their governments decisions [OR: 2.05 (95%CI: 1.74-2.42)] and lacked trust in their government [OR: 2.10 (95%CI: 1.74-2.42)] had a higher risk of having SpMH alterations. Conclusion: Nearly 30.0% of respondents indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic altered their SpMH. This outcome was associated with political, sociodemographic, and health risk factors. These findings should help policymakers develop post-pandemic community interventions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of self-reported health status during COVID-19 lockdown among surveyed Ecuadorian population: a cross sectional study 96%
- Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia 95%
- Misinformation on covid-19 origin and its relationship with perception and knowledge about social distancing: A cross-sectional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 93%
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 93%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with mental well-being, social connections and existing vulnerabilities: an Austrian survey study 95%
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 93%
- Gender Differences in Health Protective Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: An Empirical Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 94%
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 94%
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 95%
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 93%
- Are Geographic Factors Associated With Poorer Outcomes In Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19? 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.