Back

Genetic landscape of an in vivo protein interactome

Besse, S.; Sakaguchi, T.; Gauthier, L.; Sahaf, Z.; Peloquin, O.; Gonzalez, L.; Castellanos-Girouard, X.; Kocatug, N.; Matta, C.; Hussin, J. G.; Michnick, S. W.; Serohijos, A. W. R.

2023-12-15 genomics
10.1101/2023.12.14.571726 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks accurately map environmental perturbations to their molecular consequences in cells, but effects of genome-wide genetic variation on PPIs remain unknown. We hypothesized that PPI networks integrate genetic and environmental effects, potentially defining biochemical mechanisms underlying complex polygenic traits. Here, we measured 61 PPIs in inbred strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with [~]12,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome. Unlike mRNA expression and protein abundance that are primarily affected by SNPs local (in "cis") to a gene, PPIs are predominantly affected by SNPs far (in "trans") to the genomic loci of the interacting proteins. However, consistent with the PPI networks small-world characteristic, these transacting SNPs are in neighboring genes in the network. We likewise discovered SNPs in non-coding RNAs and post-transcriptional regulators (3 UTRs) with, counterintuitively, larger PPI-modulating effects than SNPs within protein-coding regions. Finally, we inferred known and novel mechanisms of action for yeast and human drugs. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIProtein-interaction quantitative trait locus ("piQTL") mapping reveals sensitivity of in vivo PPIs to polymorphisms across the yeast genome C_LIO_LITrans-piQTLs significantly outnumber and are stronger than cis-piQTLs C_LIO_LISNPs in non-coding RNAs and 3 UTRs have comparable effects to PPI as SNPs in coding regions C_LIO_LIpiQTL mapping reveals known and novel mechanism of yeast and human drugs C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.