AVENGERS: Analysis of Variant Effects using Next Generation sequencing to Enhance BRCA2 Stratification
Sahu, S.; Galloux, M.; Southon, E.; Caylor, D.; Sullivan, T.; Arnaudi, M.; Geh, J.; Chari, R.; Papaleo, E.; Sharan, S. K.
Show abstract
Accurate interpretation of genetic variation is a critical step towards realizing the potential of precision medicine. Sequencing-based genetic tests have uncovered a vast array of BRCA2 sequence variants. Due to limited clinical, familial and/or epidemiological data, thousands of variants are considered to be variants of uncertain significance (VUS). To determine the functional impact of VUSs, here we develop AVENGERS: Analysis of Variant Effects using NGs to Enhance BRCA2 Stratification, utilizing CRISPR-Cas9-based saturation genome editing (SGE) in a humanized-mouse embryonic stem cell line. We have categorized nearly all possible missense single nucleotide variants (SNVs) encompassing the C-terminal DNA binding domain of BRCA2. We have generated the function scores for 6270 SNVs, covering 95.5% of possible SNVs in exons 15-26 spanning residues 2479-3216, including 1069 unique missense VUS, with 81% functional and 14% found to be nonfunctional. Our classification aligns strongly with pathogenicity data from ClinVar, orthogonal functional assays and computational meta predictors. Our statistical classifier exhibits 92.2% sensitivity and 96% specificity in distinguishing clinically benign and pathogenic variants recorded in ClinVar. Furthermore, we offer proactive evidence for 617 SNVs being non-functional and 3396 SNVs being functional demonstrated by impact on cell growth and response to DNA damaging drugs like cisplatin and olaparib. This classification serves as a valuable resource for interpreting unidentified variants in the population and for physicians and genetic counselors assessing BRCA2 VUSs in patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.