Assessing adverse effects and unspecific effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS)
Zhao, H.; Horn, U.; Freund, M.; Bujanow, A.; Gundlach, C.; Hartwigsen, G.; Eippert, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranscutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a relatively recent method for non-invasively modulating neuronal activity in the human spinal cord. Despite its growing prominence, comprehensive studies addressing its potential adverse effects (AEs) and unspecific effects (UEs) are lacking. ObjectiveIn this study, we conducted a systematic investigation into the potential AEs and UEs of tsDCS in healthy volunteers. MethodsWe used a randomized double-blind within-participant design, employing anodal, cathodal and sham tsDCS of the thoracolumbar spinal cord. Our approach involved a newly-developed structured questionnaire (to assess subjectively-reported AEs) in combination with tsDCS-concurrent recording of skin conductance, cardiac and respiratory activity (to assess UEs in bodily state). ResultsThe most frequently participant-reported AEs were sensations of burning, tingling, and itching, although they were largely described as mild; skin redness (experimenter-reported) occurred even more frequently. Importantly, when comparing AEs between active and sham tsDCS via frequentist and Bayesian analysis approaches, the results were largely in favour of no difference between conditions (with the exception of skin redness). A similar picture emerged for most UE metrics, suggesting that tsDCS does not induce changes in bodily state, at least as measured by our autonomic nervous system metrics. ConclusionWe believe that the strategy employed here could serve as a starting point for a systematic AE and UE assessment in clinical populations, longitudinal designs and when stimulating different spinal sites. Taken together, our results contribute to assessing the tolerability, safety and specificity of tsDCS, in order to further the investigation of spinal cord function in health and disease.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 94%
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 94%
- Comparison of TENS electrodes and textile electrodes for electrocutaneous warning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 93%
- Towards optimization of oscillatory stimulation during sleep 93%
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances emotional bias towards happiness in healthy young adults: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating phasic transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) with pupil dilation: the importance of stimulation intensity and sensory perception 95%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 94%
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.