Back

Precipitation and Extraction Methods for Protein Purification: A Meta-Analysis of Purification Performance and Cost-Effectiveness

Decker, J. S.; Yano, U.; Melgar, R. M.; Lynch, M. D.

2023-12-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.12.14.571684 bioRxiv
Show abstract

For protein drug purification, packed-bed chromatography often remains both the predominant method and a bottleneck for cost and scalability. Accordingly, extensive efforts have been made to develop alternatives, such as precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction. Despite decades of development, such methods have been slow to see adoption in commercial processes. To diagnose the key barriers to implementation and guide future work, we have systematically reviewed studies of protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction. We classify the products, methods, and results of 168 publications representing 290 unique purification operations and analyze these operations in terms of both process economics and purification performance. Whereas it is generally assumed that precipitation and extraction methods will have lower costs than chromatography, we find that this is only the case under specific process conditions such as at a large manufacturing scale and low initial sample purity. Furthermore, we find that only a small number of the many precipitation and extraction methods reported to date have shown readiness for implementation in protein drug purification processes. Finally, we identify key factors governing both the economic and purification performance of this class of methods: first, that operating costs are almost entirely predictable by the ratio between the mass of phase-forming materials used and the mass of product protein yielded; second, that use of modern optimization techniques such as Design of Experiments is associated with significantly better purification performance and cost-effectiveness. HighlightsO_LIAlternative separation purification methods are not always cheaper than chromatography C_LIO_LIThe use of a combination of phase separating agents remains largely underexplored/underutilized C_LIO_LILower initial purity and increasing production scale favor phase-separation over chromatography C_LIO_LIThe direct material usage rate is an important predictor of alternative separation cost-effectiveness C_LIO_LICurrent alternative separation method development has largely ignored optimization of direct material usage rate C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.2%
2
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.5%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
New Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
17
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
19
Chemical Engineering Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Journal of Biological Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
24
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Synthetic Biology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
29
Journal of Biotechnology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%