Identifying low-dimensional trajectories of mechanically-ventilated patient systems: Empirical phenotypes of joint patient+care processes to enhance temporal analysis in ARDS research
Stroh, J. N.; Sottile, P.; Wang, Y.; Smith, B.; Bennett, T. D.; Moss, M.; Albers, D.
Show abstract
Analyzing patient data under current mechanical ventilation (MV) management processes is essential to understand MV consequences over time and to hypothesize improvements to care. However, progress is complicated by the complexity of lung-ventilator system (LVS) interactions, patient-care and patient-ventilator heterogeneity, and a lack of classification schemes for observable behavior. Ventilator waveform data originate from patient-ventilator interactions within the LVS while care processes manage both patients and ventilator settings. This study develops a computational pipeline to segment joint waveform and care settings timeseries data into phenotypes of the data generating process. The modular framework supports many methodological choices for representing waveform data and unsupervised clustering. The pipeline is generalizable although empirical output is data- and algorithm-dependent. Applied individually to 35 ARDS patients including 8 with COVID-19, a median of 8 phenotypes capture 97% of data using naive similarity assumptions on waveform and MV settings data. Individuals phenotypes organize around ventilator mode, PEEP, and tidal volume with additional delineation of waveform behaviors. However, dynamics are not solely driven by setting changes. Fewer than 10% of phenotype changes link to ventilator settings directly. Evaluation of phenotype heterogeneity reveals LVS dynamics that cannot be discretized into sub-phenotypes without additional data or alternate assumptions. Individual phenotypes may also be aggregated for use in scalable analysis, as behaviors in the 35 patient cohort comprise 16 cohort-scale LVS types. Further, output phenotypes compactly discretize the data for longitudinal analysis and may be optimized to resolve features of interest for specific applications.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifiable identification of flow-limited ventilator dyssynchrony with the deformed lung ventilator model 96%
- Comparing physiological impacts of positive pressure ventilation versus self-breathing via a versatile cardiopulmonary model incorporating a novel alveoli opening mechanism 93%
- Super-resolution Left Ventricular Flow and Pressure Mapping by Navier-Stokes-Informed Neural Networks 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Signal Demodulation-based Method for the Early Detection of Cheyne-Stokes Respiration 94%
- PVP1–The People’s Ventilator Project: A fully open, low-cost, pressure-controlled ventilator 94%
- Rett syndrome severity estimation with the BioStamp nPoint using interactions between heart rate variability and body movement 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.