Exploring the impact of microbial manipulation on the early development of kelp (Saccharina latissima) using an ecological core microbiome framework.
Park, J.; Schenk, S.; Davis, K.; Clark, J.; Wegener Parfrey, L.
Show abstract
Kelp cultivation is a rapidly expanding economic sector, as kelp are valued for a wide range of commercial products and for restoration of kelp forest ecosystems. Microbes associated with kelp and other macroalgae play a critical role in processes such as nutrient exchange, chemical signaling, and defense against pathogens. Thus, manipulating the microbiome to enhance macroalgal growth and resilience is a promising, but largely untested, tool in sustainable kelp cultivation. The core microbiome hypothesis suggests that bacteria that are consistently found on a host (the core microbes) are likely to have a disproportionate impact on host biology, making them an attractive target for microbiome manipulation. Here, we surveyed wild Saccharina latissima and their surrounding environment to identify core bacterial taxa, compared to cultivated kelp, and experimentally tested the effect of cultured bacterial isolates on kelp development. We find that core bacteria are nearly absent in cultivated juvenile sporophytes in nurseries but eventually colonized after outplanting kelp to ocean farm sites. We find that bacterial inoculants can have both positive and negative effects on kelp development. In line with predictions from the core microbiome hypothesis, we find a positive correlation between the frequency of the bacterial genus in the wild and the bacterial effect on the number of sporophytes in kelp co-culture experiments. IMPORTANCEThe core microbiome hypothesis suggests that symbiotic microorganisms consistently associated with hosts have functional effects on host biology and health. However, there is a lack of evidence to either support or refute this idea. This study surveys the distribution of bacteria on wild and cultivated kelp to identify the core microbiome and tests the ability of bacterial isolates cultured from the surface of wild kelp to influence kelp growth and development in laboratory microbial manipulation experiments. The frequency of bacterial genera on wild kelp was positively correlated with influence on kelp development in laboratory experiments, providing support for the core microbiome hypothesis.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An experimental test of the influence of microbial manipulation on sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) supports the the core influences host function hypothesis 99%
- The complexities of inferring symbiont function: Paraburkholderia symbiont dynamics in social amoeba populations and its impact on the amoeba microbiome 96%
- Expanding the diversity of bacterioplankton isolates and modeling isolation efficacy with large scale dilution-to-extinction cultivation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Daily feeding rhythm linked to microbiome composition in two zooplankton species 95%
- Effect of plastic and seaweed shelters on the skin microbiome of lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus used as cleaner fish in aquaculture pens 94%
- The impact of primary colonizers on the community composition of river biofilm 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- New isolates refine the ecophysiology of the Roseobacter CHAB-I-5 lineage 95%
- A meta-analysis of the stony coral tissue loss disease microbiome finds key bacteria in lesions and unaffected tissue of diseased colonies 95%
- Geochemical constraints on bacteriophage infectivity in terrestrial environments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking metagenomic marine microbial growth prediction from codon usage bias and peak-to-trough ratios 94%
- The coral symbiont Candidatus Aquarickettsia is variably abundant in threatened Caribbean acroporids and transmitted horizontally. 94%
- Chlamydiae as symbionts of photosynthetic dinoflagellates 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.