Socioeconomic inequities in care experienced by women with breast cancer in England: An intersectional cross-sectional study.
Estupinan Fdez. de Mesa, M.; Marcu, A.; Ream, E.; Whitaker, K. L.
Show abstract
PurposeGuided by the intersectionality framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England. MethodsSecondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 English National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (NCPES). We applied disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with deprivation status. We then applied multivariable logistic regression (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals) to ascertain the relationship of reporting a positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and trust-level factors. ResultsPoorer breast cancer care experience was mostly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Similar findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Younger respondents were less likely than older patients to rate their care favourably. Pakistani, Indian, Chinese, and Black African women were less likely than White British women to rate their care favourably. Respondents from the most socioeconomic deprived backgrounds were less likely than the most affluent ones to rate their care favourably. ConclusionThere is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalization to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 92%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 92%
- Surgical candidacy and treatment uptake among women with cervical cancer at public referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening 92%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 92%
- Knowledge towards breast cancer, and breast self-examination practices and its barriers among university female students in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient Centered Perspectives on Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Investigation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care 92%
- Analysis of HER2-low breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: a nationwide retrospective cohort study 91%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers to help-seeking for Malaysian women with symptoms of breast cancer: a mixed-methods, two-step cluster analysis 95%
- Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review 89%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 91%
- The Impact of the UK COVID-19 Lockdown on the Screening, Diagnostics and Incidence of Breast, Colorectal, Lung and Prostate Cancer in the UK: a Population-Based Cohort Study 89%
- Underlying reasons for post-mortem diagnosed lung cancer cases – A robust retrospective comparative study from Hungary (HULC study) 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.