Feasibility of adjuvant self-administered intravaginal 5-fluorouracil cream following primary treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women living with HIV in Kenya: study protocol for a pilot trial
Mungo, C.; Bukusi, E.; Ellis, G.; Ogollah, C.; Rota, G.; Omoto, J.; Rahangdale, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundWomen living with HIV (WLWH), the majority of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), are at higher risk of cervical precancer, known as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and are up to six times more likely to get cervical cancer. Current CIN treatment methods, primarily ablation or excision, have high treatment failure rates among WLWH, up to 30% for CIN grade 2 or 3 (CIN2/3) at 24 months following ablation. Without strong follow-up many WLWH with treatment failure are at risk of developing invasive cervical cancer, highlighting the urgent need for improved CIN treatment methods. Prior studies in high-income countries (HICs) have demonstrated that 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) cream, an antimetabolite drug that is easily accessible in LMICs, can be used intravaginally as adjuvant therapy following primary CIN2/3 treatment in WLWH to reduce CIN2/3 recurrence. While the safety, acceptability, and efficacy of self-administered 5-FU for cervical precancer treatment has been demonstrated in HICs, it has not been studied among WLWH in LMICs who bear the greatest burden of cervical cancer. MethodsWe are conducting a Phase I pilot study investigating the feasibility of using 5-FU cream as an adjuvant, self-administered intravaginal therapy following cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 (CIN2/3) treatment among WLWH in Kenya (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05362955). Twelve participants will be enrolled in this single-arm study. Participants will self-administer 2g of 5% 5-FU cream intravaginally every other week for eight applications. The primary objective is to determine safety, defined as the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events (AEs) using a standardized grading scale. The secondary objectives are uptake, tolerability, adherence, and acceptability. ResultsThere are no results at this time as this is an ongoing study. DiscussionTo achieve the World Health Organization (WHO) 90/70/90 global cervical cancer elimination goals, which include 90% of women with cervical precancer adequately treated by 2030, it is essential to employ innovative and resource-appropriate strategies to improve cervical precancer treatment among WLWH. The use of 5-FU as adjuvant therapy following current screen & treat programs may be a feasible and scalable strategy to optimize outcomes in this high-risk group. This clinical trial will provide important feasibility data to inform future randomized efficacy trials in LMICs. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05362955 Key messages regarding feasibilityO_ST_ABSWhat uncertainties existed regarding feasibility?C_ST_ABSThere are no uncertainties to report yet as the study is ongoing. What are the key feasibility findings?There are no key feasibility findings as the study is ongoing. What are the implications of the feasibility findings for the design of the main study?Feasibility findings from this trial that will inform the design of the future study include safety findings - frequency and severity of adverse events, which may necessitate a different dosing schedule for the main study, adherence findings - if low levels of adherence to self-administered therapies are established, the authors will work on designing strategies to improve adherence prior to moving to a larger study. Finally, acceptability findings including the levels of male partner support of the treatment will inform future study efforts.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- A community-engaged mHealth intervention to increase uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in China: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial 94%
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase I study on the pharmacokinetics of intravaginal, self-administered artesunate vaginal pessaries among women in Kenya 95%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Comparative Assessment of p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining Technology for Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Living with HIV (COMPASS-DUST) – Study Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Home-Based Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Monitoring Option: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 92%
- Population-Based Sero-Epidemiological Study Protocol For The Impact Of Smoking On SARS-COV-2 Infection And COVID-19 Outcomes – The Troina Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Study with 637 Brazilian Women 90%
- Clinical diagnosis of COVID-19: a prompt, feasible, and sensitive diagnostic tool for COVID-19 based on a 1,757-patient cohort (The AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 diagnosis) 90%
- Cervical Cancer Screening in South Florida Veteran Population 2014-2020: Cytology and High-Risk HPV Correlation and HPV Epidemiology 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design of the HPV-Automated Visual Evaluation (PAVE) Study: Validating a Novel Cervical Screening Strategy 94%
- Cervicovaginal immune mediators increase when young women begin to have sexual intercourse: a prospective study and meta-analysis 91%
- Evaluation of ID NOW and RT-PCR for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an Ambulatory Population 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.