Evaluation of resampling-based inference for topological features of neuroimages
Vandekar, S. N.; Kang, K.; Woodward, N. D.; Huang, A.; McHugo, M.; Garbeet, S.; Stephens, J.; Shinohara, R.; Schwartzman, A.; Blume, J.
Show abstract
Many recent studies have demonstrated the inflated type 1 error rate of the original Gaussian random field (GRF) methods for inference of neuroimages and identified resampling (permutation and bootstrapping) methods that have better performance. There has been no evaluation of resampling procedures when using robust (sandwich) statistical images with different topological features (TF) used for neuroimaging inference. Here, we consider estimation of distributions TFs of a statistical image and evaluate resampling procedures that can be used when exchangeability is violated. We compare the methods using realistic simulations and study sex differences in life-span age-related changes in gray matter volume in the Nathan Kline Institute Rockland sample. We find that our proposed wild bootstrap and the commonly used permutation procedure perform well in sample sizes above 50 under realistic simulations with heteroskedasticity. The Rademacher wild bootstrap has fewer assumptions than the permutation and performs similarly in samples of 100 or more, so is valid in a broader range of conditions. We also evaluate the GRF-based pTFCE method and show that it has inflated error rates in samples less than 200. Our R package, pbj, is available on Github and allows the user to reproducibly implement various resampling-based group level neuroimage analyses.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective peak inference: Unbiased estimation of raw and standardized effect size at local maxima 98%
- Voxel-wise and spatial modelling of binary lesion masks: Comparison of methods with a realistic simulation framework 97%
- Fighting or Embracing Multiplicity in Neuroimaging? Neighborhood Leverage versus Global Calibration 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping individual differences in intermodal coupling in neurodevelopment 98%
- Simultaneous Confidence Regions for Image Excursion Sets: a Validation Study with Applications in fMRI 97%
- Functional connectivity across the human subcortical auditory system using an autoregressive matrix-Gaussian copula graphical model approach with partial correlations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Easy to interpret Coordinate Based Meta-Analysis of neuroimaging studies: Analysis of Brain Coordinates (ABC) 95%
- Improving 3D Edge Detection for Visual Inspection of MRI Coregistration and Alignment 95%
- Putting the brain in a box: a toolbox for creating Cartesian Geometric Representations with Isometric Dimensions (Cgrids) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.