Back

LncRNA Bigheart trans-activates gene expression in a feed forward mechanism that facilitates calcineurin-NFAT signaling in myocardial hypertrophy

Mangraviti, N.; Ruhle, F.; Kinet, V.; Hegenbarth, J.-C.; Dirkx, E.; Spano, G.; De Majo, F.; Peppas, P.; Martens, L.; Ghandi, S.; Colpaert, R.; Ruperez, C.; Olieslagers, S.; Falcao-Pires, I.; Calore, M.; Witten, A.; da Costa Martins, P.; Mayr, M.; Muller, O.; Stoll, M.; De Windt, L. J.

2023-12-12 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.12.11.571094 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Terminally differentiated cardiomyocytes exhibit hypertrophy as a default response to injury by translating biomechanical stress into a complex network of intracellular signaling events. The molecular intricacies how calcium-dependent signaling engage molecular circuits and epigenetic modifications to activate deleterious gene programs remain enigmatic. Here we report on the re-activation of the evolutionarily conserved lncRNA "Bigheart", which is repressed in the postnatal myocardium and quickly re-activated in a calcineurin-NFAT-dependent fashion in the diseased myocardium in man and mouse. In line, AAV9-mediated overexpression of lncRNA Bigheart in otherwise healthy primary cardiomyocytes or mouse hearts suffices to drive maladapative hypertrophy. Conversely, mice receiving a "Gapmer" antisense oligonucleotide designed to specifically silence endogenous lncRNA Bigheart display resistance to biomechanical stress-induced myocardial remodeling, indicating its requirement in left ventricular hypertrophy. Mechanistically, lncRNA Bigheart recruits the RNA binding proteins hnRNP-F1 and HMGB1 to modulate the local chromatin environment and trans-activate Bigheart target genes including Rcan1 to stimulate calcineurin-NFAT coupling. Our observations confirm that human heart failure arises from specific susceptibilities in gene regulatory circuits that are amenable for therapeutic intervention using RNA-based therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.