Back

Larval growth rate affects wing shape more than eyespot size in the seasonally polyphenic butterfly Melanitis leda

Molleman, F.; Moore, E. M.; Halali, S.; Halali, D.; Kodandaramaiah, U.; van Bergen, E.; Brakefield, P. M.; Oostra, V.

2023-12-11 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.12.11.571078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Butterflies often show adaptive phenotypic plasticity where environmental cues during early stages are used to produce a phenotype that maximizes fitness in the environment experienced by adults. Many tropical satyrine butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) are seasonally polyphenic and produce distinct wet- and dry-season form adults providing tight environment-phenotype matching in seasonal environments. Dry-season forms, which are expressed in the dry season, can be induced in the laboratory by growing larvae at low temperatures or on poor food quality. Since both these factors also tend to reduce larval growth rate, larval growth rate may be an internal cue that translates the environmental cues into the expression of phenotypes. If this is the case, we predict that slower-growing larvae would be more likely to develop a dry-season phenotype. To test this hypothesis, we measured both larval growth rate and adult phenotype (eyespot size and wing shape) of individuals of the common evening brown butterfly (Melanitis leda), reared at various temperatures and on various host-plant species. We found that among treatments, larvae with lower growth rates (low temperature, particular host plants) were more likely to develop dry-season phenotypes (small eyespots, falcate wing tips), but within treatments, larval growth rate was mainly linked to wing shape, not eyespot size. These relationships tended to be stronger for males than females as males showed a wider range of eyespot sizes and wing shapes. Overall, only plasticity in wing shape appears to be (partly) mediated by larval growth, and in a sex-specific manner.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
10
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
16
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
20
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
27
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%