Back

Infection Inspection: Using the power of citizen science to help with image-based prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli

Farrar, A.; Feehily, C.; Turner, P.; Zagajewski, A.; Chatzimichail, S.; Crook, D.; Andersson, M.; Oakley, S.; Barrett, L.; El Sayyed, H.; Fowler, P. W.; Nellaker, C.; Kapanidis, A. N.; Stoesser, N.

2023-12-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.12.11.23299807 medRxiv
Show abstract

Antibiotic resistance is an urgent global health challenge, necessitating rapid diagnostic tools to combat its escalating threat. This study introduces innovative approaches for expedited bacterial antimicrobial resistance profiling, addressing the critical need for swift clinical responses. Between February and April 2023, we conducted the Infection Inspection project, a citizen science initiative in which the public could participate in advancing an antimicrobial susceptibility testing method based on single-cell images of cellular phenotypes in response to ciprofloxacin exposure. A total of 5,273 users participated, classifying 1,045,199 images. Notably, aggregated user accuracy in image classification reached 66.8%, lower than our deep learning models performance at 75.3%, but accuracy increased for both users and the model when ciprofloxacin treatment was greater than a strains own minimum inhibitory concentration. We used the users classifications to elucidate which visual features influence classification decisions, most importantly the degree of DNA compaction and heterogeneity. We paired our classification data with an image feature analysis which showed that most of the incorrect classifications were due to cellular features that varied from the expected response. This understanding informs ongoing efforts to enhance the robustness of our deep learning-based bacterial classifier and diagnostic methodology. Our successful engagement with the public through citizen science is another demonstration of the potential for collaborative efforts in scientific research, specifically increasing public awareness and advocacy on the pressing issue of antibiotic resistance, and empowering individuals to actively contribute to the development of novel diagnostics. Lay summaryAntibiotic resistance is a big health problem worldwide. We need fast ways to find out if bacteria are resistant to antibiotics. In our study, we develop new methods to do this quickly. We ran an online project called Infection Inspection from February to April 2023, in which 5,273 people took part. Together, they classified more than a million pictures of bacterial cells, helping our project use these pictures to detect antibiotic resistance. The volunteers performed well, getting near 67% of the answers right. We also learned which pictures helped or confused them. This will help us make our computer program better. This project didnt just help science; it also taught people about antibiotic resistance. Partnerships between the public and scientists can make a difference to developing technologies that protect our health.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.0%
7
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
17
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
27
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%