Estimating butterfly population trends from sparse monitoring data using Generalized Additive Models
Edwards, C. B.; Schultz, C.; Sinclair, D. G.; Marschalek, D. A.; Crone, E. E.
Show abstract
Concerns of declines in insects and population level responses to climate change have highlighted the importance of estimating trends in abundance and phenology from existing monitoring data. As the taxa with the most systematic monitoring data, butterflies are a frequent focus for understanding trends in insects. Even so, ecologists often have only sparse monitoring data for at-risk butterfly populations. As existing statistical techniques are typically poorly suited to such data, these at-risk populations are frequently excluded from analyses of butterfly trends. Here we present guidelines for estimating population trends from sparse butterfly monitoring data using generalized additive models (GAMs), based on extensive simulations and our experiences fitting hundreds of butterfly species. These recommendations include pre-processing steps, model structure choices, and post-hoc analysis decisions that reduce bias and prevent or mitigate biologically implausible model fits. We also present the ButterflyGamSim package for the programming language R, available at https://github.com/cbedwards/butterflyGamSims. This open source software provides tools for ecologists and applied statisticians to simulate realistic butterfly monitoring data and test the efficacy of different GAM model choices or monitoring schemes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing predictive accuracy of species abundance models in dynamic systems 96%
- Dynamic Generalised Additive Models (DGAM) for forecasting discrete ecological time series 96%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution 96%
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models 96%
- Using visual encounter data to improve capture-recapture abundance estimates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A model-based hypothesis framework to define and estimate the diel niche via the 'Diel.Niche' R package 96%
- A Guide to Pre-Processing High-Throughput Animal Tracking Data 93%
- Distinguishing within- from between-individual effects: How to use the within-individual centering method for quadratic patterns 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close-kin mark-recapture assessments 95%
- Failure to meet the exchangeability assumption in Bayesian multispecies occupancy models: Implications for study design 94%
- gauseR: Simple methods for fitting Lotka-Volterra models describing Gause's "Struggle for Existence" 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.