A Kaspar Hauser experiment for innateness of numerical cognition
Lorenzi, E.; Perrino, M.; Zanon, M.; Messina, A.; Vallortigara, G.
Show abstract
Whether non-symbolic encoding of quantity is predisposed at birth with dedicated hard-wired neural circuits is debated. Here we presented newly-hatched visually naive chicks with stimuli (flashing dots) of either identical or different numerousness (with a ratio 1:3) with their continuous physical appearance (size, contour length, density, convex hull) randomly changing. Chicks spontaneously tell apart the stimuli on the basis of the number of elements. Upon presentation of either fixed or changing numerousness chicks also showed different expression of early gene c-fos in the visual Wulst, the hippocampal formation, the intermediate medial mesopallium, and the caudal part of the nidopallium caudolaterale. The results support the hypothesis that the ability to discriminate quantities does not require any specific instructive experience. Evidence for innateness of non-symbolic numerical cognition have implications for both neurobiology and philosophy of mathematics.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The unique neuronal structure and neuropeptide repertoire in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi shed light on the evolution of animal nervous systems 92%
- Source identity shapes spatial preference in primary auditory cortex during active navigation 91%
- Changing air density affects flight costs in low-flying birds 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social and asocial learning in zebrafish are encoded by a shared brain network that is differentially modulated by local activation 94%
- Top-down acetylcholine contributes to social discrimination via enabling action potentials in olfactory bulb vasopressin cells 93%
- Working memory performance is tied to stimulus complexity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.