Multilayer meta-matching: translating phenotypic prediction models from multiple datasets to small data
Chen, P.; An, L.; Wulan, N.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S.; Ooi, L. Q. R.; Kong, R.; Chen, J.; Wu, J.; Chopra, S.; Bzdok, D.; Eickhoff, S. B.; Holmes, A.; Yeo, B. T. T.
Show abstract
Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is widely used to predict phenotypic traits in individuals. Large sample sizes can significantly improve prediction accuracies. However, for studies of certain clinical populations or focused neuroscience inquiries, small-scale datasets often remain a necessity. We have previously proposed a "meta-matching" approach to translate prediction models from large datasets to predict new phenotypes in small datasets. We demonstrated large improvement of meta-matching over classical kernel ridge regression (KRR) when translating models from a single source dataset (UK Biobank) to the Human Connectome Project Young Adults (HCP-YA) dataset. In the current study, we propose two meta-matching variants ("meta-matching with dataset stacking" and "multilayer meta-matching") to translate models from multiple source datasets across disparate sample sizes to predict new phenotypes in small target datasets. We evaluate both approaches by translating models trained from five source datasets (with sample sizes ranging from 862 participants to 36,834 participants) to predict phenotypes in the HCP-YA and HCP-Aging datasets. We find that multilayer meta-matching modestly outperforms meta-matching with dataset stacking. Both meta-matching variants perform better than the original "meta-matching with stacking" approach trained only on the UK Biobank. All meta-matching variants outperform classical KRR and transfer learning by a large margin. In fact, KRR is better than classical transfer learning when less than 50 participants are available for finetuning, suggesting the difficulty of classical transfer learning in the very small sample regime. The multilayer meta-matching model is publicly available at GITHUB_LINK.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison Between Gradients and Parcellations for Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior 96%
- Capturing Brain-Cognition Relationship: Integrating Task-Based fMRI Across Tasks Markedly Boosts Prediction and Test-Retest Reliability 95%
- Towards the Interpretability of Deep Learning Models for Multi-modal Neuroimaging: Finding Structural Changes of the Ageing Brain 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting sex, age, general cognition and mental health with machine learning on brain structural connectomes 96%
- Direct linkage detection with multimodal IVA fusion reveals markers of age, sex, cognition, and schizophrenia in large neuroimaging studies 95%
- DeepComBat: A Statistically Motivated, Hyperparameter-Robust, Deep Learning Approach to Harmonization of Neuroimaging Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.