Back

A Multi-State Markov Model for the Longitudinal Analysis of Clinical Composite Outcomes in Heart Failure

Lora, D.; Leiva-Garcia, A.; Bernal, J. L.; Velez, J.; Palacios, B.; Villareal, M.; Capel, M.; Rosillo, N.; Hernandez, M.; Bueno, H.

2023-12-07 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.12.05.23299570 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe statistical analysis of composite outcomes is challenging. The Clinical Outcomes, HEalthcare REsource utilizatioN, and relaTed costs (COHERENT) model was developed to describe and compare all components (incidence, timing and duration) of composite outcomes, but its statistical analysis remained unsolved. The aim of the study is to assess a multi-State Markov model as one statistical solution for the COHERENT model. MethodsA cohort of 3280 patients admitted to the emergency department or hospital for heart failure during year 2018 were followed during one year. The state of the patient was registered at the end of each day during 365 days as: home, emergency department (ED), hospital, re-hospital, re-ED, and death. Outcomes of patients with or without severe renal disease (sRD) were compared as an example. A Multi-State Markov model was developed to explain transitions to and from these states during follow-up. ResultsA Multi-State Markov model showed, adjusted for age and sex, a significantly lower likelihood of patients with sRD to return home regardless of the state in which they were (ED [->] HOME (HR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.54-0.95), RE-ED [->] HOME (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.75-0.93), HOSPITAL [->] HOME (HR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.69-0.86), RE-HOSPITAL [->] HOME (HR, 0.82; 95%CI, 0.74-0.92) and a higher mortality risk, in particular at the hospital and at home (HOME [->] Death [HR, 1.54; 95%CI, 1.01-2.37] and HOSPITAL [->] Death [HR, 1.71; 95%CI, 1.30-2.24]. ConclusionMulti-state Markov models offer a statistical solution for the comprehensive analysis of composite outcomes assessed as transitions from different clinical states. Clinical PerspectiveO_LIWhat is new? O_LIAn integrated analysis of all components of composite endpoints including its incidence and duration is possible using the COHERENT model with analysis of transition risks. C_LIO_LIA statistical approach based on Markov chain models is a new potential statistical solution for the multivariate estimation of the risk of transitions in mutually exclusive composite endpoints. C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat are the clinical implications? O_LIThe use of the COHERENT model and Markov models is an opportunity to analyze composite endpoints and understand better the relationships between its components and, potentially, to improve the performance of statistical analysis in randomized controlled trials. C_LIO_LIThe utilization of the COHERENT model and Markov models in randomized controlled trials should be validated in future observational studies and in randomized controlled trials. C_LI C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
7
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%