Association between frailty assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale 2.0 and outcomes of acute stroke in older patients
Forti, P.; Ciani, M.; Maioli, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundFrailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by an increased vulnerability to stressors and increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. While older patients with acute stroke are routinely screened for prestroke disability using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), because of its known association with stroke outcomes, prestroke frailty is still rarely assessed. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a popoular tool for retrospective frailty assessment in the acute setting. The study hypothesis was that prestroke frailty measured with CFS was associated with stroke outcome of older patients independent of prestroke disability assessed with mRS. MethodsWe recruited 4086 individuals aged [≥]65 years consecutively admitted with acute stroke to an Italian hospital. Prestroke disability (mRS [≥]3) was assessed at admission. Prestroke CFS was retrospectively assessed using information from the medical records. Logistic models determined the association of CFS with poor functional outcome, prolonged discharge, unfavorable discharge setting, and poor rehabilitation potential. Cox models determined the association of CFS with 30-day and 1-month mortality. All models were adjusted for prestroke disability and other major confounders. ResultsParticipants were median age 81 years (25th-75th percentile, 75-87 years), 55.0% female, 82.6% with ischemic stroke, and 26.3% with prestroke disability. Overall prevalence of prestroke frailty (CFS [≥]4) was 41.6%. Multivariable-adjusted logistic models showed that CFS was associated with increasing risk of all outcomes except prologed discharge. In severe frailty (CFS 7-8), OR (95%CI) was 3.44 (2.33-5.07) for poor functional outcome, 0.53 (0.38-0.75) for prolonged discharge, 1.89 (0.36-263) for unfavourable discharge, and 6.24 (3.80-10.26) for poor rehabilitation potential (reference CFS 1-3). In multivariable adjusted-Cox models, CFS was unrelated to 30-day mortality but HR (95%CI) of 1-year mortality was significant for both CFS 4-6 (1.70, 1.36-2.11) and CFS 7-8 (1.69, 1.25-2.30). ConclusionsPrestroke frailty measured with CFS was associated with higher risk of several adverse outcomes even after adjustment for prestroke disability and other major confounders.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 94%
- Blood Pressure Control From 2011 To 2019 In Patients 90 Days After Stroke 94%
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence and risk factors for post-stroke delirium in the elderly: a national inpatient sample (NIS) analysis 94%
- Association between kidney measurements and cognitive performance in patients with ischemic stroke 92%
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 90%
- Frailty and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: Examining reciprocal associations within a measurement burst design 89%
- Vascular brain pathology is more important than neurodegeneration in the pathogenesis of pre-stroke cognitive impairment 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
- Acute ischemic Stroke in Tsutsugamushi: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms and Risk Factors 89%
- Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin for traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.